Literature DB >> 7720563

Engrailed-mediated repression of Ultrabithorax is necessary for the parasegment 6 identity in Drosophila.

R S Mann1.   

Abstract

The homeotic genes of Drosophila are expressed in overlapping domains along the anterior-to-posterior axis and specify the distinct morphological patterns of each parasegment. Within single parasegments, the levels of homeotic gene expression are often modulated, in part because of cross-regulation by other homeotic gene products. However, the functional significance of different levels of homeotic gene expression is unclear. Here modulations in Ultrabithorax (Ubx) expression within parasegment 6 are examined. Specifically, Ubx is shown to be down-regulated in the posterior compartment of this parasegment by engrailed (en). The significance of Ubx repression by en was demonstrated by characterizing the expression of the Ubx target gene, Distal-less (Dll). In the posterior compartment of parasegment 6, Dll is normally expressed in a small cluster of cells. If Ubx is expressed uniformly via a heat-shock promoter, Dll is inappropriately repressed in these posterior compartment cells. In the anterior compartment of parasegment 6, Dll is normally repressed by high levels of Ubx. However, if en is expressed uniformly via a heat-shock promoter, Ubx is repressed and Dll is derepressed. Because Dll is required for the development of larval sensory structures, these results demonstrate that en-mediated repression of Ubx in the posterior compartment is necessary for the morphology of parasegment 6. Thus, different levels of homeotic gene expression can be important for their segmental patterning functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7720563     DOI: 10.1242/dev.120.11.3205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  8 in total

Review 1.  A dynamic network of morphogens and transcription factors patterns the fly leg.

Authors:  Carlos Estella; Roumen Voutev; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Discrimination in partnership: compartment-specific interactions of Hox proteins.

Authors:  K G Guruharsha; K Vijayraghavan
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Functional similarity in appendage specification by the Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A Drosophila HOX genes.

Authors:  F Casares; M Calleja; E Sánchez-Herrero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Divergent role of the Hox gene Antennapedia in spiders is responsible for the convergent evolution of abdominal limb repression.

Authors:  Sara Khadjeh; Natascha Turetzek; Matthias Pechmann; Evelyn E Schwager; Ernst A Wimmer; Wim G M Damen; Nikola-Michael Prpic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A screen for modifiers of Deformed function in Drosophila.

Authors:  K W Harding; G Gellon; N McGinnis; W McGinnis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Distinct roles of the homeotic genes Ubx and abd-A in beetle embryonic abdominal appendage development.

Authors:  D L Lewis; M DeCamillis; R L Bennett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Compartmental modulation of abdominal Hox expression by engrailed and sloppy-paired patterns the fly ectoderm.

Authors:  Brian Gebelein; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  The Hippo pathway coactivator Yorkie can reprogram cell fates and create compartment-boundary-like interactions at clone margins.

Authors:  Joanna C D Bairzin; Maya Emmons-Bell; Iswar K Hariharan
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 14.136

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.