Literature DB >> 7720451

Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality?

M E Williamson1, W G Lewis, P J Finan, A S Miller, P J Holdsworth, D Johnston.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the serial changes that take place in the first year after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma, in terms both of anorectal physiology and clinical bowel function. Our hypothesis was that some patients never regain satisfactory anorectal function, because the operative procedure leads to permanent impairment of anorectal reflex and motor function.
METHOD: Nineteen patients underwent serial tests of anorectal function, before and for one year after low anterior resection. The median level of the anastomosis above the anal high-pressure zone was 3 (range, 1-6) cm.
RESULTS: Anal resting pressure (median (interquartile range)) was significantly decreased three months after operation (62 (46-72) cm H2O) and one year after operation was still significantly less (58 (48-73) cm H2O) than before operation (77 (58-93) cm H2O) (P < 0.01). Maximum tolerated volume in the neorectum decreased from 130 (88-193) ml before operation to 80 (51-89) ml three months after operation (P < 0.005) but returned to preoperative values by six months (125 (60-140) ml) (P = not significant) and remained at these values one year after operation. The volume in the "neorectal" balloon required to elicit a maximum rectoanal inhibitory reflex was significantly less three months after operation than before operation (50 (43-60) ml compared with 100 (73-100) ml; P < 0.005); one year after operation, the volume required was still significantly less than before operation (50 ml vs. 100 ml) (P < 0.015). Bowel frequency increased from 1 (1-2) in 24 hours before operation to 4 (2-5) times in 24 hours after operation and remained at 4 times in 24 hours throughout the first year after operation. Three months after operation, 53 percent of patients experienced some degree of fecal leakage and 24 percent experienced urgency of defecation. These aspects of bowel function improved with time, but even one year after operation, 29 percent of patients continued to experience fecal leakage and 18 percent wore a protective pad.
CONCLUSIONS: Anal resting pressure decreased significantly after low anterior resection and did not recover in the course of the first year after operation. Moreover, the volume of an air-filled balloon in the neorectum that was required to elicit maximum inhibition of the anal sphincter was significantly less after anterior resection that before operation. These long-term and presumably permanent changes in physiologic behavior of the anoneorectum after low anterior resection provide an explanation for the failure of some patients to regain satisfactory bowel function following that procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7720451     DOI: 10.1007/bf02054232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  40 in total

1.  Risk factors for persistent anal incontinence after restorative proctectomy in rectal cancer patients with anal incontinence: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Taek-Gu Lee; Sung-Bum Kang; Seung Chul Heo; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  External coloanal anastomosis without covering stoma in low-lying rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ashraf Abdel-Azeem Mohamed; Abdel-Fatah Saleh Abdel-Fatah; Khaled Mohamed Mahran; Abo-Bakr Mohamed Mohie-Eldin
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  Shifting Paradigms in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Applications of Transanal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Grace Clara Lee; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 4.  Pouch operation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancer: long-term clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer leads to impairment of the anal sphincter.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Werner K-H Kauer; Hjalmar Nekarda; Ludwig Schmid; Hubert J Stein; Joerg-Ruediger Siewert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Prospective evaluation of the defecatory functional results in patients following aorto-aortic reconstruction surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Sebastian Dobrowolski; Jacek Wojciechowski; Marek Dobosz; Stanisław Hać; Zbigniew Sledziński
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome.

Authors:  Filippo Pucciani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

9.  Nerve supply to the internal anal sphincter differs from that to the distal rectum: an immunohistochemical study of cadavers.

Authors:  Yusuke Kinugasa; Takashi Arakawa; Gen Murakami; Mineko Fujimiya; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers.

Authors:  Victor W Fazio; Massarat Zutshi; Feza H Remzi; Yann Parc; Reinhard Ruppert; Alois Fürst; James Celebrezze; Susan Galanduik; Guy Orangio; Neil Hyman; Leslie Bokey; Emmanuel Tiret; Boris Kirchdorfer; David Medich; Marcus Tietze; Tracy Hull; Jeff Hammel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.