OBJECTIVE: The relative dose potency of cumulative doses of terbutaline sulfate inhaled via Turbuhaler and via a pressurized metered dose inhaler was estimated with respect to lung efficacy and systemic effect. METHODS: The study was an open, crossover, randomized, multicenter study including 31 adult patients with asthma [forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), 65% of predicted]. The patients inhaled terbutaline doses of 0.125, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg (a total of 4 mg) at 30-minute intervals. Lung function [FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow at 75% of FVC (FEF75%), and peak expiratory flow (PEF)], and systemic effect variables (serum potassium, tremor, pulse, blood pressure) were monitored prior to the first inhalation and 15 to 25 minutes after each inhaled dose. RESULTS: The mean relative dose potency of terbutaline inhaled via Turbuhaler compared with pressurized metered dose inhaler was 1.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 1.8) with respect to FEV1 and serum potassium, respectively. The corresponding relative dose potencies for PEF, FVC, and FEF75% were 1.0, 1.2, and 1.6, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two devices. No differences between the devices were evident with regard to blood pressure and pulse. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that Turbuhaler is more efficient in the delivery of inhaled terbutaline to the lungs compared with the conventional pressurized metered dose inhaler.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The relative dose potency of cumulative doses of terbutaline sulfate inhaled via Turbuhaler and via a pressurized metered dose inhaler was estimated with respect to lung efficacy and systemic effect. METHODS: The study was an open, crossover, randomized, multicenter study including 31 adult patients with asthma [forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), 65% of predicted]. The patients inhaled terbutaline doses of 0.125, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg (a total of 4 mg) at 30-minute intervals. Lung function [FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow at 75% of FVC (FEF75%), and peak expiratory flow (PEF)], and systemic effect variables (serum potassium, tremor, pulse, blood pressure) were monitored prior to the first inhalation and 15 to 25 minutes after each inhaled dose. RESULTS: The mean relative dose potency of terbutaline inhaled via Turbuhaler compared with pressurized metered dose inhaler was 1.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 1.8) with respect to FEV1 and serum potassium, respectively. The corresponding relative dose potencies for PEF, FVC, and FEF75% were 1.0, 1.2, and 1.6, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two devices. No differences between the devices were evident with regard to blood pressure and pulse. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that Turbuhaler is more efficient in the delivery of inhaled terbutaline to the lungs compared with the conventional pressurized metered dose inhaler.
Authors: S Drblik; G Lapierre; R Thivierge; J Turgeon; P Gaudreault; B Cummins-McManus; I Verdy; J Haddon; J Lee; S Spier Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.791