Literature DB >> 7719785

Designing medical informatics research and library--resource projects to increase what is learned.

W W Stead1, R B Haynes, S Fuller, C P Friedman, L E Travis, J R Beck, C H Fenichel, B Chandrasekaran, B G Buchanan, E E Abola.   

Abstract

Careful study of medical informatics research and library-resource projects is necessary to increase the productivity of the research and development enterprise. Medical informatics research projects can present unique problems with respect to evaluation. It is not always possible to adapt directly the evaluation methods that are commonly employed in the natural and social sciences. Problems in evaluating medical informatics projects may be overcome by formulating system development work in terms of a testable hypothesis; subdividing complex projects into modules, each of which can be developed, tested and evaluated rigorously; and utilizing qualitative studies in situations where more definitive quantitative studies are impractical.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7719785      PMCID: PMC116182          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  1 in total

1.  Preparing a medical informatics research grant proposal: general principles.

Authors:  R A Miller; R Patil; J A Mitchell; C Friedman; W W Stead; M S Blois; R K Anderson
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1989-02
  1 in total
  34 in total

1.  A national agenda for public health informatics: summarized recommendations from the 2001 AMIA Spring Congress.

Authors:  W A Yasnoff; J M Overhage; B L Humphreys; M LaVenture
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  I Sim; P Gorman; R A Greenes; R B Haynes; B Kaplan; H Lehmann; P C Tang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Reference standards in evaluating system performance.

Authors:  Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Integrating medical informatics and health services research: the need for dual training at the clinical health systems and policy levels.

Authors:  Kenneth D Mandl; Thomas H Lee
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  The JAMIA Student Editorial Board: peer review education in biomedical informatics.

Authors:  Kevin B Johnson; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  A current perspective on medical informatics and health sciences librarianship.

Authors:  Gerald J Perry; Nancy K Roderer; Soraya Assar
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-04

7.  Evaluating the impact and costs of deploying an electronic medical record system to support TB treatment in Peru.

Authors:  Hamish S F Fraser; Joaquin Blaya; Sharon S Choi; Cesar Bonilla; Darius Jazayeri
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

8.  Authorship issues related to software tools.

Authors:  Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  A framework and model for evaluating clinical decision support architectures.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  Translating clinical informatics interventions into routine clinical care: how can the RE-AIM framework help?

Authors:  Suzanne Bakken; Cornelia M Ruland
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.