Literature DB >> 7718818

A comparison of some of the characteristics of patients with occupational and non-occupational asthma.

E J Axon1, J R Beach, P S Burge.   

Abstract

Occupational asthma is the most frequently diagnosed occupational lung disease reported to the SWORD (Surveillance of Work-related and Occupational Respiratory Disease) scheme. However, diagnosing occupational asthma is not straightforward, and establishing a link with work may be difficult. This study was undertaken to determine the differences between patients with occupational asthma and those with non-occupational asthma which might help in their diagnosis. Information was collected using a self-completed questionnaire. Questionnaires were distributed to 30 subjects aged 18-65 years at each of two clinics--one for patients with occupational asthma and one for those with cryptogenic and environmental asthma. Replies were received from 26 patients with occupational asthma (87%) and 29 patients with non-occupational asthma (97%). The age of onset was significantly higher for those with occupational asthma (42.6 vs 20.7 years). Significantly more subjects with occupational asthma reported improvement on holiday, whereas no significant difference was found in the numbers reporting worsening of symptoms on work days. Those with occupational asthma were less likely to report seasonal variation in symptoms, exacerbation by allergies, pets and stress, or a family history of asthma. Subjects with occupational asthma were more likely to become unemployed (50% vs 3%). Recognition of some of these features in a patient's history may help in the difficult task of differentiating occupational from non-occupational asthma, potentially avoiding the need for exhaustive investigations in some patients. The high prevalence of holiday improvement among subjects with non-occupational asthma suggested that domestic or environmental allergies arising outside the workplace may have been making an important contribution to ongoing symptoms in these subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7718818     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/45.2.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  5 in total

1.  Prevalence and risk factors for work related asthma in young adults.

Authors:  R D Caldeira; H Bettiol; M A Barbieri; J Terra-Filho; C A Garcia; E O Vianna
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma.

Authors:  P J Nicholson; P Cullinan; A J Newman Taylor; P S Burge; C Boyle
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Predictors of delayed return to work or job loss with respiratory ill-health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean Peters; Simon Pickvance; Jane Wilford; Ewan Macdonald; Lindsay Blank
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-02-13

Review 4.  Occupational asthma: a review.

Authors:  L J Lombardo; J R Balmes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Diagnostic approach in cases with suspected work-related asthma.

Authors:  Tor B Aasen; P Sherwood Burge; Paul K Henneberger; Vivi Schlünssen; Xaver Baur
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.646

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.