Literature DB >> 7718504

Contrast coding by cells in the cat's striate cortex: monocular vs. binocular detection.

A Anzai1, M A Bearse, R D Freeman, D Cai.   

Abstract

Many psychophysical studies of various visual tasks show that performance is generally better for binocular than for monocular observation. To investigate the physiological basis of this binocular advantage, we have recorded, under monocular and binocular stimulation, contrast response functions for single cells in the striate cortex of anesthetized and paralyzed cats. We applied receiver operating characteristic analysis to our data to obtain monocular and binocular neurometric functions for each cell. A contrast threshold and a slope were extracted from each neurometric function and were compared for monocular and binocular stimulation. We found that contrast thresholds and slopes varied from cell to cell but, in general, binocular contrast thresholds were lower, and binocular slopes were steeper, than their monocular counterparts. The binocular advantage ratio, the ratio of monocular to binocular thresholds for individual cells, was, on average, slightly higher than the typical ratios reported in human psychophysics. No single rule appeared to account for the various degrees of binocular summation seen in individual cells. We also found that the proportion of cells likely to contribute to contrast detection increased with stimulus contrast. Less contrast was required under binocular than under monocular stimulation to obtain the same proportion of cells that contribute to contrast detection. Based on these results, we suggest that behavioral contrast detection is carried out by a small proportion of cells that are relatively sensitive to near-threshold contrasts. Contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) for the cell population, estimated from this hypothesis, agree well with behavioral data in both the shape of the CSF and the ratio of binocular to monocular sensitivities. We conclude that binocular summation in behavioral contrast detection may be attributed to the binocular superiority in contrast sensitivity of a small proportion of cells which are responsible for threshold contrast detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7718504     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800007331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  8 in total

1.  Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: monocular versus binocular mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Truchard; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  How do attention and adaptation affect contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Gerardo Viera; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Chronic bisphenol A exposure triggers visual perception dysfunction through impoverished neuronal coding ability in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Fan Hu; Guangwei Xu; Linke Zhang; Huan Wang; Jiachen Liu; Zhi Chen; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Contrast adaptation and representation in human early visual cortex.

Authors:  Justin L Gardner; Pei Sun; R Allen Waggoner; Kenichi Ueno; Keiji Tanaka; Kang Cheng
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Small-aperture monovision and the Pulfrich experience: absence of neural adaptation effects.

Authors:  Sotiris Plainis; Dionysia Petratou; Trisevgeni Giannakopoulou; Hema Radhakrishnan; Ioannis G Pallikaris; W Neil Charman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neuronal basis of perceptual learning in striate cortex.

Authors:  Zhen Ren; Jiawei Zhou; Zhimo Yao; Zhengchun Wang; Nini Yuan; Guangwei Xu; Xuan Wang; Bing Zhang; Robert F Hess; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The neural basis of spatial vision losses in the dysfunctional visual system.

Authors:  Jinfeng Huang; Yifeng Zhou; Caiyuan Liu; Zhongjian Liu; Chunmeng Luan; Tzvetomir Tzvetanov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of top-down influence suppression on behavioral and V1 neuronal contrast sensitivity functions in cats.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Zheng Ye; Fei Xu; Xiangmei Hu; Hao Yu; Shen Zhang; Yanni Tu; Qiuyu Zhang; Qingyan Sun; Tianmiao Hua; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.