Literature DB >> 7718154

Tetrodotoxin blockade of amygdala overlapping with poisoning impairs acquisition of conditioned taste aversion in rats.

G Roldan1, J Bures.   

Abstract

The role of several forebrain structures in the association of the short-term gustatory memory (GSTM) of the conditioned stimulus (CS; 0.1% sodium saccharin) with the visceral unconditioned stimulus (US; 0.15 M LiCl, 2% b.wt.) in acquisition of conditioned taste aversion (CTA) was investigated. Experiment 1 examined the effects of bilateral reversible inactivation of amygdala (Amy), hippocampus (Hipp), gustatory cortex (GC), bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST), lateral hypothalamic area (LHA), ventral thalamus (VT) or LHA+VT, induced by intracerebral injection of tetrodotoxin (TTX; 10 ng/microliters per site) applied before i.p. injection of LiCl to rats anesthetized by pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) immediately after saccharin drinking. Amy blockade resulted in a complete disruption of learning, while the inactivation of the remaining areas examined produced mild or no impairments. The dose-related effects of TTX injection into Amy were investigated in Experiment 2. Doses of 3 and 1 ng TTX were as effective as the 10 ng dose used in Expt. 1. However, 0.3 ng or saline did not interfere with CTA acquisition. Analysis of the retrograde amnesic effect produced by transient amygdalectomy (Experiment 3), showed that TTX (10 ng) injected immediately or 1.5 h after LiCl application induced a marked learning disruption, whereas no amnesia was elicited at 6 and 24 h post-acquisition intervals. It is suggested that Amy plays an essential role in the associative phase of acquisition, but not in the consolidation of the permanent taste aversion engram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7718154     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90107-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  18 in total

1.  Glutamatergic activity in the amygdala signals visceral input during taste memory formation.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Miranda; Guillaume Ferreira; Leticia Ramirez-Lugo; Federico Bermudez-Rattoni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Molecular signals into the insular cortex and amygdala during aversive gustatory memory formation.

Authors:  Federico Bermúdez-Rattoni; Leticia Ramírez-Lugo; Ranier Gutiérrez; María Isabel Miranda
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  Area postrema lesions attenuate LiCl-induced c-Fos expression correlated with conditioned taste aversion learning.

Authors:  Corinne M Spencer; Lisa A Eckel; Rahel Nardos; Thomas A Houpt
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-08-24

4.  Somatostatin and corticotrophin releasing hormone cell types are a major source of descending input from the forebrain to the parabrachial nucleus in mice.

Authors:  Ali Magableh; Robert Lundy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Effects of lesions in different nuclei of the amygdala on conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo; Guadalupe Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Conditioned taste aversion dependent regulation of amygdala gene expression.

Authors:  Siva K Panguluri; Nobuyuki Kuwabara; Yi Kang; Nigel Cooper; Robert F Lundy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-11-13

7.  Mitogen-activated protein kinase in the amygdala plays a critical role in lithium chloride-induced taste aversion learning.

Authors:  Bumsup Kwon; Thomas A Houpt
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Neonatal amphetamine exposure and hippocampus-mediated behaviors.

Authors:  Andrew M Smith; Wei-Jung A Chen
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Comparison of somatostatin and corticotrophin-releasing hormone immunoreactivity in forebrain neurons projecting to taste-responsive and non-responsive regions of the parabrachial nucleus in rat.

Authors:  Siva Panguluri; Shalini Saggu; Robert Lundy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Spared anterograde memory for shock-probe fear conditioning after inactivation of the amygdala.

Authors:  Hugo Lehmann; Dallas Treit; Marise B Parent
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.