Literature DB >> 7718059

Content validation of key features on a national examination of clinical decision-making skills.

G Bordage1, C Brailovsky, H Carretier, G Page.   

Abstract

Key features (KFs) represent the critical, or essential, steps in the identification and management of a clinical problem. KFs for 59 clinical problems were defined by members of a test committee for the Medical Council of Canada as part of their efforts to create a more valid written examination of clinical decision-making skills for the Canadian Qualifying Examination in Medicine. In order to evaluate the content validity of KFs that the test committee had defined for the examination, 99 physicians from outside the committee, who came from clerkship programs at all 16 of Canada's medical schools, participated in three studies conducted in 1991. The first study was retrospective and was designed to find the degree of agreement or disagreement that the outside physicians had with the KFs already defined for each problem by the committee members. The second study was prospective and was to compare the KFs generated de novo by the participants with those already defined by the committee members. The third study was to gather the outside physicians' opinions of the frequencies with which graduating students in Canada are exposed to the 59 problems used in the retrospective and prospective studies. Almost all the KFs defined by the test committee were corroborated by the outside physicians, 92% in the retrospective study and 94% in the prospective one.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7718059     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199504000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  15 in total

1.  An information retrieval service to support clinical decision-making at the point of care.

Authors:  F Sullivan; M Gardner; K van Rijsbergen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Defining competency-based evaluation objectives in family medicine: key-feature approach.

Authors:  Kathrine Lawrence; Tim Allen; Carlos Brailovsky; Tom Crichton; Cheri Bethune; Michel Donoff; Tom Laughlin; Stephen Wetmore; Marie-Pierre Carpentier; Shaun Visser
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.

Authors:  C P Van Der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.853

4.  [Academic teaching at the department of ophthalmology of the University Clinic of Saarland (UKS) : The Homburg "Ophthalmo-Week"].

Authors:  B Käsmann-Kellner; B Seitz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Learning the facts in medical school is not enough: which factors predict successful application of procedural knowledge in a laboratory setting?

Authors:  Ralf Schmidmaier; Stephan Eiber; Rene Ebersbach; Miriam Schiller; Inga Hege; Matthias Holzer; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  The influence of objectives, learning experiences and examination blueprint on medical students' examination preparation.

Authors:  K McLaughlin; S Coderre; W Woloschuk; T Lim; D Muruve; H Mandin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  What variables can influence clinical reasoning?

Authors:  Vahid Ashoorion; Mohammad Javad Liaghatdar; Peyman Adibi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Beyond standard checklist assessment: Question sequence may impact student performance.

Authors:  Jeff LaRochelle; Steven J Durning; John R Boulet; Cees van der Vleuten; Jeroen van Merrienboer; Jeroen Donkers
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-04

9.  Virtual patients design and its effect on clinical reasoning and student experience: a protocol for a randomised factorial multi-centre study.

Authors:  James Bateman; Maggie E Allen; Jane Kidd; Nick Parsons; David Davies
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  A structured process to develop scenarios for use in evaluation of an evidence-based approach in clinical decision making.

Authors:  Patricia J Manns; Johanna Darrah
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2012-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.