Literature DB >> 7717791

Trends in pharmacologic management of hypertension in the United States.

T A Manolio1, J A Cutler, C D Furberg, B M Psaty, P K Whelton, W B Applegate.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two new classes of antihypertensive agents were introduced in the 1980s, but their effectiveness in preventing heart disease and stroke has not been demonstrated. Lack of evidence of their efficacy might reasonably be expected to discourage their widespread use in management of hypertension.
METHODS: Use of various classes of antihypertensive agents was estimated from published drug use information in an effort to estimate trends in antihypertensive drug use and evaluate the impact of these trends on costs of antihypertensive therapy in the United States.
RESULTS: Proportionate use of the five major antihypertensive drug classes shifted markedly between 1982 and 1993. Diuretics accounted for 56% of all hypertensive drug mentions in 1982 but only 27% in 1993, a relative decline of 52%. Use of beta-blockers and central agents also declined during this period. Proportionate use of calcium antagonists showed the greatest gains, increasing from 0.3% to 27%, while the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors increased from 0.8% to 24%. Given the higher costs of the newer agents, and assuming an estimated total cost of antihypertensive medications in 1992 of $7 billion, approximately $3.1 billion would have been saved had 1982 prescribing practices remained in effect in 1992.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of calcium antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertension has increased dramatically in the past 10 years. Without convincing evidence of the advantages of these agents, it is difficult to explain the continued decline in the use of less expensive agents, such as diuretics and beta-blockers, which are the only antihypertensive agents proved to reduce stroke and coronary disease in hypertensive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7717791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  28 in total

Review 1.  Old antihypertensive agents-diuretics and beta-blockers: do we know how and in whom they lower blood pressure?

Authors:  D A Sica
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Contemporary practice patterns in the management of newly diagnosed hypertension.

Authors:  F A McAlister; K K Teo; R Z Lewanczuk; G Wells; T J Montague
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Cost containment for treating hypertension in African Americans: impact of a combined ACE inhibitor-calcium channel blocker.

Authors:  D S Kountz
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 4.  Measuring adherence to practice guidelines for the management of hypertension: an evaluation of the literature.

Authors:  Jessica L Milchak; Barry L Carter; Paul A James; Gail Ardery
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  The impact of differences in methodology and population characteristics on the prevalence of hypertension in US adults in 1976-1980 and 1999-2002.

Authors:  Jacqueline D Wright; June Stevens; Charles Poole; Katherine M Flegal; Chirayath Suchindran
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Prescribing pattern of antihypertensive drugs in primary care units in Turkey: results from the TURKSAHA study.

Authors:  Adnan Abaci; Omer Kozan; Aytekin Oguz; Mahmut Sahin; Necmi Deger; Huseyin Senocak; Nizamettin Toprak; Haydar Sur; Cetin Erol
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Thiazide-type diuretics and beta-adrenergic blockers as first-line drug treatments for hypertension.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Cutler; Barry R Davis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Cost of hypertension treatment.

Authors:  J S Ahluwalia; J P Doyle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Why do American drug companies spend more than $12 billion a year pushing drugs? Is it education or promotion? Characteristics of materials distributed by drug companies: four points of view.

Authors:  S M Wolfe
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Misperceptions about beta-blockers and diuretics: a national survey of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Christopher Jepson; David A Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.