Literature DB >> 7716846

Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

T J Polascik1, R G Moore, M T Rosenberg, L R Kavoussi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic retropubic urethropexy has recently been described as an alternative method to the surgical correction of pure stress urinary incontinence. This study compares the operative technique and results of laparoscopic colposuspension with traditional open Burch urethropexy to treat women with stress urinary incontinence.
METHODS: We assessed the short-term results of 12 women who underwent a modified laparoscopic Burch urethropexy for the correction of stress urinary incontinence and compared these with a similar contemporary group of 10 women who underwent a traditional open Burch colposuspension procedure.
RESULTS: Ten women (83%) who underwent the laparoscopic procedure are continent with a mean follow-up of 20.8 months, and 7 women (70%) who had an open Burch colposuspension are continent at a mean follow-up of 35.6 months. The laparoscopic procedure took an average of 1.5 hours longer than the open repair (P < 0.01). Patients who underwent the laparoscopic urethropexy required less postoperative analgesia (mean, 14.2 mg morphine equivalents versus 131.4 mg; P < 0.01), shorter length of hospitalization (mean, 1.9 days versus 4.9 days; P < 0.01), and a more expedient return to normal activity when compared with those who underwent open Burch colposuspension.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension offers a less invasive approach to the surgical correction of stress urinary incontinence and can provide successful outcomes in properly selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7716846     DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80057-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  R G Moore; J B Adams; A W Partin; S G Docimo; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Pubic bone anchoring in the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence: new applications to an old concept.

Authors:  S Madjar; M Beyar; O Nativ
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

3.  Minimally invasive surgery: competent and continent?

Authors:  S L Stanton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1996

4.  Tension free vaginal tape versus Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Ehab El-Barky; Ali El-Shazly; Osama Abdul El-Wahab; Elijah O Kehinde; Adel Al-Hunayan; Khaleel A Al-Awadi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  A randomized comparison of transobturator tape and Burch colposuspension in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Ahmet Akin Sivaslioglu; Eray Caliskan; Ismail Dolen; Ali Haberal
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-12-20

Review 6.  A transperitoneal laparoscopic approach to endourology.

Authors:  A M Kaynan; H N Winfield
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 7.  Laparoscopic surgery for female urinary incontinence: prudence shall prevail.

Authors:  S Das
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  Burch colposuspension.

Authors:  Nikolaus Veit-Rubin; Jean Dubuisson; Abigail Ford; Jean-Bernard Dubuisson; Sherif Mourad; Alex Digesu
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.696

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.