Literature DB >> 7716631

The use of the pain drawing as a screening measure to predict psychological distress in chronic low back pain.

H Parker1, P L Wood, C J Main.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The ability of three new methods of scoring the Pain Drawing to predict psychological distress in two cohorts of 100 patients with chronic low back pain was investigated.
OBJECTIVES: Patients completed a Pain Drawing and questionnaire measures of psychological distress and were given a standard physical examination. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The two cohorts were significantly different on all variables (except for disability).
METHODS: The relationship between the three new scoring systems and measures of distress, physical factors, and disability was investigated.
RESULTS: The new scoring methods had high reliability. Pain Sites was a more accurate predictor of distress, but was unable to do so with sufficient specificity/sensitivity. Body Map did not correlate with physical/disability measures.
CONCLUSION: Using the new scoring systems, it was not possible to identify distressed patients with sufficient sensitivity/specificity, nor to differentiate between organic and nonorganic pain patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7716631     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199501150-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  Prognostic factors and treatment-related changes associated with return to work in the multimodal treatment of chronic back pain.

Authors:  A A Vendrig
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1999-06

2.  Reliability of a preliminary 3-D pain mapping program.

Authors:  Robert N Jamison; Tabitha A Washington; Padma Gulur; Gilbert J Fanciullo; John R Arscott; Gregory J McHugo; John C Baird
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Screening for patients at risk of developing chronic incapacity.

Authors:  C J Main; P J Watson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-12

4.  Outcome measures and their everyday use in chiropractic practice.

Authors:  Paul M Hinton; Randall McLeod; Blaine Broker; C Elizabeth Maclellan
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2010-06

5.  Prolonged bed rest as adjuvant therapy after complex reconstructive spine surgery.

Authors:  Rex A W Marco; Ryan M Stuckey; Stephanie P Holloway
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Colored Pain Drawing as a Clinical Tool in Differentiating Neuropathic Pain from Non-Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Nalini Sehgal; Debra B Gordon; Scott Hetzel; Miroslav Misha Backonja
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.750

7.  Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Ebbe S Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Validity of pain drawings for predicting psychological status outcome in patients with recurrent or chronic low back pain.

Authors:  J H Abbott; Megan Foster; Lucien Hamilton; Michael Ravenwood; Nicholas Tan
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-02

9.  Psychometric Study of the Pain Drawing.

Authors:  Lisa H Trahan; Emily Cox-Martin; Carrie E Johnson; Patrick M Dougherty; Jun Yu; Lei Feng; Christina Cook; Diane M Novy
Journal:  J Appl Biobehav Res       Date:  2017-04-07

10.  Computer-aided surface estimation of pain drawings - intra- and inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  Ann L Persson; Sofia Garametsos; Jonna Pedersen
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.