Literature DB >> 7715062

Predictors of successful prompted voiding among incontinent nursing home residents.

J G Ouslander1, J F Schnelle, G Uman, S Fingold, J G Nigam, E Tuico, B Bates-Jensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple, noninvasive assessment strategy that will enable nursing home staff to identify incontinent residents who respond well to prompted voiding.
DESIGN: Incontinent nursing home residents underwent an extensive clinical and functional assessment and then 7 days of prompted voiding. Data from the assessment and the first 3 days of prompted voiding were used to predict responsiveness to the intervention.
SETTING: Seven nursing homes. PATIENTS: A cohort of 191 incontinent, long-stay nursing home residents who passed a simple behavioral screen (able to state their name or reliably point to one of two named objects). INTERVENTION: Prompted voiding was carried out by trained research nurse's aides from 7 AM to 7 PM for 7 days. The intervention was maintained in responsive residents 5 days per week for an additional 9 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical checks for wetness were done by research staff hourly from 7 AM to 7 PM for 3 days in a baseline condition, during days 5 through 7 of the 7-day prompted voiding intervention, and for 3 days at the end of 9 weeks of prompted voiding in the responsive group. Outcome measures were percentage of checks wet and response to prompted voiding, with "responders" defined as residents with an average of one or fewer wet episode per day on days 5 through 7 of prompted voiding.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight (41%) of the residents were responders. Their wet percentage went from 26.7% to 6.4% at the end of 1 week and was maintained at 9.6% after 9 weeks of prompted voiding. The best predictors of responsiveness were the wet percentage and the appropriate toileting percentage during the first 3 days of prompted voiding, the self-care subscale score of the Multidimensional Observational Scale for the Elderly, and the ability to ambulate without human assistance. The best sensitivity and specificity in identifying responders was achieved when either the wet percentage was lower than 20% or the appropriate toileting percentage was higher than 66% during the first 3 days of prompted voiding (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 69%). Those residents falsely identified as responders by these criteria still had a 46% relative reduction in wetness.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of nursing home residents respond well to prompted voiding. The most responsive residents can be easily identified using data collected during a 3-day trial of the intervention. The assessment strategy is consistent with federal guidelines and could be used to facilitate quality control by assessing changes in percentage of wetness from the expected norm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7715062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  15 in total

1.  "Mine own countree": quality of care in nursing homes.

Authors:  J Chouinard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-05-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The evolving paradigm of health technology assessment: reflections for the millennium.

Authors:  R N Battista; M J Hodge
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-05-18       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Distance coursework and coaching to improve nursing home incontinence care: lessons learned.

Authors:  Anna N Rahman; John F Schnelle; Robert Applebaum; Kate Lindabury; Sandra Simmons
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Randomized multilevel intervention to improve outcomes of residents in nursing homes in need of improvement.

Authors:  Marilyn J Rantz; Mary Zwygart-Stauffacher; Lanis Hicks; David Mehr; Marcia Flesner; Gregory F Petroski; Richard W Madsen; Jill Scott-Cawiezell
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 5.  Prompted voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults.

Authors:  S Eustice; B Roe; J Paterson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

6.  Thirty-Year Trends in Nursing Home Composition and Quality Since the Passage of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act.

Authors:  Shekinah A Fashaw; Kali S Thomas; Ellen McCreedy; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.669

7.  How do people make continence care happen? An analysis of organizational culture in two nursing homes.

Authors:  Stacie Salsbury Lyons
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-12-11

8.  Introducing a new incontinence management system for nursing home residents.

Authors:  Nahla R Al-Samarrai; Gwen C Uman; Teeb Al-Samarrai; Cathy A Alessi
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.669

9.  Prevalence of constipation symptoms in fecally incontinent nursing home residents.

Authors:  John F Schnelle; Sandra F Simmons; Linda Beuscher; Emily N Peterson; Ralf Habermann; Felix Leung
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 10.  Urinary and fecal incontinence in nursing home residents.

Authors:  Felix W Leung; John F Schnelle
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.