Literature DB >> 7714346

A critique of instruments and methods to detect, diagnose, and rate delirium.

M J Smith1, W S Breitbart, M M Platt.   

Abstract

This document reviews existing instruments for evaluation of delirium. Instruments have been grouped into four categories: tests that screen for cognitive impairment, delirium diagnostic instruments, delirium-specific numerical rating scales, and laboratory and paraclinical exams. Analysis of instruments was based on comparison of their psychometric properties as well as subjective judgment. Guidelines are suggested for choosing the appropriate instrument according to the type of clinical evaluation or delirium research envisaged. Important factors in choosing an instrument, besides the appropriateness of its psychometric characteristics, include administration time constraints, level of rater expertise, and patient capabilities. By familiarizing investigators with the variety of evaluation instruments available, this work should permit more appropriate instrument selection in future studies on delirium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714346     DOI: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)00066-T

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  23 in total

1.  Phenomenological subtypes of delirium in older persons: patterns, prevalence, and prognosis.

Authors:  Frances M Yang; Edward R Marcantonio; Sharon K Inouye; Dan K Kiely; James L Rudolph; Michael A Fearing; Richard N Jones
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.386

Review 2.  Drug-induced delirium. Incidence, management and prevention.

Authors:  G L Carter; A H Dawson; R Lopert
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Delirium assessment in the critically ill.

Authors:  John W Devlin; Jeffrey J Fong; Gilles L Fraser; Richard R Riker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Evaluation of the memorial delirium assessment scale (MDAS) for the screening of delirium by means of simulated cases by palliative care health professionals.

Authors:  Nada Fadul; Guddi Kaur; Tao Zhang; J Lynn Palmer; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Evidence-based treatment of delirium in patients with cancer.

Authors:  William Breitbart; Yesne Alici
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Symptom assessment in cancer patients.

Authors:  Michael Naughton; Jade Homsi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Persistent delirium predicts greater mortality.

Authors:  Dan K Kiely; Edward R Marcantonio; Sharon K Inouye; Michele L Shaffer; Margaret A Bergmann; Frances M Yang; Michael A Fearing; Richard N Jones
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Quantifying the Severity of a Delirium Episode Throughout Hospitalization: the Combined Importance of Intensity and Duration.

Authors:  Sarinnapha M Vasunilashorn; Edward R Marcantonio; Yun Gou; Margaret A Pisani; Thomas G Travison; Eva M Schmitt; Richard N Jones; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: a valid, rapid, observational tool for screening delirium in the PICU*.

Authors:  Chani Traube; Gabrielle Silver; Julia Kearney; Anita Patel; Thomas M Atkinson; Margaret J Yoon; Sari Halpert; Julie Augenstein; Laura E Sickles; Chunshan Li; Bruce Greenwald
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Post-operative delirium after hip fracture treatment - a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theocharis Chr Kyziridis
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2006-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.