Literature DB >> 7714286

Principle-based ethics and nurses' attitudes towards artificial feeding.

L Day1, T Drought, A J Davis.   

Abstract

Nurses often institute artificial feeding for patients who would otherwise starve. Recently, the courts in the United States have favoured withholding or withdrawing feedings from patients who currently refuse or previously gave some indication they would refuse artificial nutrition and hydration. This paper investigates under what circumstances nurses feel justified in withholding artificial nutrition and hydration. Structured interviews were conducted with 40 cancer care nurses from two sites, and 40 dementia care nurses from two sites. The interviews were based on two vignettes, one involving an alert patient with terminal cancer, the other a patient suffering end-stage Alzheimer's dementia, and were analysed for themes coinciding with principles of deontological ethics. Investigators found that autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence most often guided nurses' decisions to withhold or implement artificial feeding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714286     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb02525.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  3 in total

1.  Artificial nutrition and hydration in terminal cancer patients: the real and the ideal.

Authors:  Do Youn Oh; Jee Hyun Kim; Se Hoon Lee; Dong Wan Kim; Seock Ah Im; Tae You Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Yung Jue Bang; Noe Kyeong Kim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 2.  Identifying the components of clinical vignettes describing Alzheimer's disease or other dementias: a scoping review.

Authors:  Harkanwal Randhawa; Aalim Jiwa; Mark Oremus
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 3.  How are treatment decisions made about artificial nutrition for individuals at risk of lacking capacity? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Gemma Clarke; Katy Harrison; Anthony Holland; Isla Kuhn; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.