Literature DB >> 7714257

Frequency contribution to the click-evoked auditory brain-stem response in human adults and infants.

C Abdala1, R C Folsom.   

Abstract

The results of previous research reports have led some investigators to hypothesize that frequency contribution to the infant click-evoked auditory brain-stem response (ABR) is low-frequency dominated and derived primarily from the apical cochlea. This is in contrast to latency and morphology of the adult click-evoked ABR which reflects contributions from the basal cochlea. Recent research, however, has suggested that a simple low-frequency first model of development does not adequately describe the infant auditory brain-stem response. This experiment was conducted as a carefully controlled comparison of infant and adult click-evoked ABRs restricted to narrow frequency ranges with notched-noise masking. The primary objective of this experiment was to define frequency contribution to wave I and V click-evoked ABR latency and morphology in adults and 3-month-old infants. Results indicate that 3-month-old infants have adultlike latency shifts (re: unmasked latency) when the ABR is recorded in the presence of notched-noise masking with center frequencies ranging from 500-8000 Hz. With high-frequency centered notches, latency, and morphology change are similar to the unmasked response, while low-frequency centered notches induce an average latency shift of approximately 3.5 ms for wave I and V of both infant and adult subjects. These data suggest that by 3 months of age, in normal hearing infants, ABR latency and appearance are determined by high-frequency spectral components in the broadband click which activate the basal cochlea. The adultlike pattern of latency shift observed in the ABR of these infants suggests that relatively mature tonotopic organization is established by 3 months of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714257     DOI: 10.1121/1.411961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Functional modeling of the human auditory brainstem response to broadband stimulation.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Hari M Bharadwaj; Golbarg Mehraei; Christopher A Shera; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Understanding degraded speech leads to perceptual gating of a brainstem reflex in human listeners.

Authors:  Heivet Hernández-Pérez; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; David McAlpine; Sumitrajit Dhar; Sriram Boothalingam; Jessica J M Monaghan; Catherine M McMahon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning and acoustic admittance in human infants: birth through 6 months.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Douglas H Keefe; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of noise exposure on young adults with normal audiograms I: Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Garreth Prendergast; Hannah Guest; Kevin J Munro; Karolina Kluk; Agnès Léger; Deborah A Hall; Michael G Heinz; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Auditory Brainstem Responses in Tinnitus: A Review of Who, How, and What?

Authors:  Victoria Milloy; Philippe Fournier; Daniel Benoit; Arnaud Noreña; Amineh Koravand
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Contralateral Inhibition of Click- and Chirp-Evoked Human Compound Action Potentials.

Authors:  Spencer B Smith; Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Barbara K Cone
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  The Correlation Between Click-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses and Future Behavioral Thresholds Determined Using Universal Newborn Hearing Screening.

Authors:  Ting-Yu Cheng; Ching-Fang Tsai; Chih-Wei Luan
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.