Literature DB >> 7713964

Nanoapatite and organoapatite implants in bone: histology and ultrastructure of the interface.

C M Müller-Mai1, S I Stupp, C Voigt, U Gross.   

Abstract

This article reports on the reaction of bone to a new family of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite biomaterials with crystal sizes similar to those of human bone. Pure nanoapatite cylinders and organoapatite cylinders containing a synthetic nanopeptide were analyzed 28 days after implantation into the spongy bone of Chinchilla rabbits. The experimental techniques used for analysis were light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Both implant types were well incorporated, and interface events were found to be similar to those observed on human bone surfaces with regard to resorption by osteoclast-like cells and bone formation by osteoblasts. Different types of giant cells were observed resorbing the outermost surfaces of implants. There seemed to be both dissolution of the implant and particulate biodegradation leading to less dense implant regions near the interface, whereas the bulk of the implants remained denser. Transmission electron micrographs revealed that bone bonding occurred with and without an afibrillar intervening layer. Given the biologic reaction observed, these implant materials should be suitable for bone replacement and the organoapatite form could be useful for additional functions such as the release of drugs and optimized release of antibiotics, growth factors, or other substances. The organic component can also be used to control physical properties in a bony implantation bed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7713964     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820290103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  14 in total

Review 1.  The powerful functions of peptide-based bioactive matrices for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Charles M Rubert Pérez; Nicholas Stephanopoulos; Shantanu Sur; Sungsoo S Lee; Christina Newcomb; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Enzyme Directed Templating of Artificial Bone Mineral.

Authors:  Erik D Spoerke; Shawn G Anthony; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 3.  Biomimetic systems for hydroxyapatite mineralization inspired by bone and enamel.

Authors:  Liam C Palmer; Christina J Newcomb; Stuart R Kaltz; Erik D Spoerke; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Mineralization of peptide amphiphile nanofibers and its effect on the differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Timothy D Sargeant; Conrado Aparicio; Joshua E Goldberger; Honggang Cui; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  [Hydroxyapatite ceramics in clinical application. Histological findings in 23 patients].

Authors:  A Liebendörfer; S Tröster
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1997-04

6.  Peptide Self-Assembly for Crafting Functional Biological Materials.

Authors:  John B Matson; R Helen Zha; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 11.354

7.  Bone regeneration with low dose BMP-2 amplified by biomimetic supramolecular nanofibers within collagen scaffolds.

Authors:  Sungsoo S Lee; Brian J Huang; Stuart R Kaltz; Shantanu Sur; Christina J Newcomb; Stuart R Stock; Ramille N Shah; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Self-Assembly for the Synthesis of Functional Biomaterials.

Authors:  Nicholas Stephanopoulos; Julia H Ortony; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Acta Mater       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 8.203

9.  Apatite formation on collagen fibrils in the presence of polyacrylic acid.

Authors:  E K Girija; Y Yokogawa; F Nagata
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite for bone repair: an animal study.

Authors:  J Brandt; S Henning; G Michler; W Hein; A Bernstein; M Schulz
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.