Literature DB >> 7712250

Consumer perceptions of pressure and force in psychiatric treatments.

A Lucksted1, R D Coursey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mental health consumers with serious mental illness were surveyed to obtain information about their experiences with and attitudes toward forced psychiatric treatment.
METHODS: A 61-item survey questionnaire developed by the authors was administered by consumer volunteers to 105 persons with serious mental illness who were attending seven rehabilitation centers in Maryland. The questionnaire covered consumers' experiences and attitudes in three areas of forced treatment: medication, outpatient therapy or rehabilitation, and hospitalization.
RESULTS: At some time during the course of their illness, 57 percent of the respondents reported having been pressured or forced into hospitalization. In the year before the survey, 30 percent reported being pressured or forced into taking medication and 26 percent into attending a therapy or rehabilitation program. The most common type of pressure or force was verbal persuasion. Generally, respondents reported negative effects from forced treatment, although the intensity of the negative effects varied by treatment area, and about half retrospectively felt that the forced treatment was in their best interest. Many respondents believed that pressure or force has an appropriate role in psychiatric treatment, although most wished to maintain the right to refuse treatment that they considered not in their best interest.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in patterns of response to pressure and force in the three treatment areas highlight the variety of consumer experiences and the need to know more about the role of forced or pressured treatment in their lives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7712250     DOI: 10.1176/ps.46.2.146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  8 in total

1.  Consumer perceptions of assertive community treatment interventions.

Authors:  Molly K Tschopp; Norman L Berven; Fong Chan
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2010-07-11

2.  Measuring strategies used by mental health providers to encourage medication adherence.

Authors:  Beth Angell
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists.

Authors:  Norman Sartorius; Wolfgang Gaebel; Helen-Rose Cleveland; Heather Stuart; Tsuyoshi Akiyama; Julio Arboleda-Flórez; Anja E Baumann; Oye Gureje; Miguel R Jorge; Marianne Kastrup; Yuriko Suzuki; Allan Tasman
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Using client satisfaction surveys to evaluate and improve services in locked and unlocked adult inpatient facilities.

Authors:  L Baker; P J Zucker; M J Gross
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.505

5.  Psychiatric patients' views on why their involuntary hospitalisation was right or wrong: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Christina Katsakou; Diana Rose; Tim Amos; Len Bowers; Rosemarie McCabe; Danielle Oliver; Til Wykes; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Persuasion or coercion? An empirical ethics analysis about the use of influence strategies in mental health community care.

Authors:  Emanuele Valenti; Domenico Giacco
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 7.  Clinical Relevance of Informal Coercion in Psychiatric Treatment-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Florian Hotzy; Matthias Jaeger
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression.

Authors:  Florian Hotzy; Anastasia Theodoridou; Paul Hoff; Andres R Schneeberger; Erich Seifritz; Sebastian Olbrich; Matthias Jäger
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.