Literature DB >> 7710723

Functional assessment scales. A study of persons after traumatic brain injury.

C V Granger1, N Divan, R C Fiedler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate disability in persons after traumatic brain injury (TBI) by using combinations of functional assessment item, subscale, domain, and full-scale scores to predict (1) the need for assistance in performance of specific physical care tasks measured in minutes of help per day provided by another person in the home and (2) the subject's level of satisfaction with life in general. This study also sought to account for the amount of supervision that persons with TBI may require beyond that needed for physical care tasks. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) contributed to prediction of subjects' physical care needs. A single-point change in total FIM score was equivalent to an average of about 5 min of help from another person per day. Satisfaction with life in general was predicted mainly by the depression subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory. However, this latter prediction was only true when subjects who required constant supervision were removed from analysis. Thus, the amount of supervision required by persons with TBI is an important variable to study in this population. Three categories of supervision were identified: constant (all of the time), periodic (daily or weekly), or not at all. The need for supervision and physical assistance from another person and a subject's satisfaction with life in general are important standards by which functional assessment instruments may be compared to reflect, in pragmatic terms, the impact of disability on the lives of individuals and on human and economic resources of the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7710723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  10 in total

1.  Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis.

Authors:  C A Hawley; R Taylor; D J Hellawell; B Pentland
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Prognostic differences for functional recovery after major lower limb amputation: effects of the timing and type of inpatient rehabilitation services in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Margaret G Stineman; Pui L Kwong; Dawei Xie; Jibby E Kurichi; Diane Cowper Ripley; David M Brooks; Douglas E Bidelspach; Barbara E Bates
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Functional outcomes by age for inpatient cancer rehabilitation: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Hunter; Julie Baltisberger
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2012-03-22

4.  Efficiency of specialist rehabilitation in reducing dependency and costs of continuing care for adults with complex acquired brain injuries.

Authors:  L Turner-Stokes; S Paul; H Williams
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Racial and ethnic differences in postacute rehabilitation outcomes after stroke in the United States.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Joanna Campbell; Yong-Fang Kuo; Anne Deutsch; Glenn V Ostir; Carl V Granger
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Gender and ethnic differences in rehabilitation outcomes after hip-replacement surgery.

Authors:  Ivonne-Marie Bergés; Yong-Fang Kuo; Glenn V Ostir; Carl V Granger; James E Graham; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  Unilateral and bilateral upper extremity weight-bearing effect on upper extremity impairment and functional performance after brain injury.

Authors:  Timothy Reistetter; Beatriz C Abreu; Jane Bear-Lehman; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.448

8.  Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age.

Authors:  Lynne Turner-Stokes; Roxana Vanderstay; Tara Stevermuer; Frances Simmonds; Fary Khan; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adel Elfeky; Kristiaan D'Août; Rebecca Lawson; Lauren R Hepworth; Nicholas D A Thomas; Abigail Clynch; Fiona J Rowe
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-27

10.  Brain Injury Functional Outcome Measure (BI-FOM): A Single Instrument Capturing the Range of Recovery in Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  John Whyte; Joseph T Giacino; Allen W Heinemann; Yelena Bodien; Tessa Hart; Mark Sherer; Gale G Whiteneck; David Mellick; Flora M Hammond; Patrick Semik; Amy Rosenbaum; Risa Nakase Richardson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 4.060

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.