Literature DB >> 7708826

Mate choice and maternal selection for specific parasite resistances before; during and after fertilization.

C Wedekind1.   

Abstract

As Hamilton & Zuk pointed out, some loci may be of special importance for sexual selection because they play a crucial role in the co-evolution between parasites and hosts. In previous work I have tried to extend Hamilton & Zuk's parasite hypothesis for sexual selection, partly by including findings of immunologists and endocrinologists: in some species, handicapping signals may specifically reveal the current needs of the immune system which depends on the host's susceptibilities to different parasites. In other species, depending on the constellation of some key variables, non-handicapping signals could directly reveal the identity of resistance genes. Despite the general conflict of interests between the sexes, sexual selection may, in these cases, lead to signallers (i.e. mostly the males) focusing on improving their offspring's survival chances instead of trying to maximize their number. Males achieve this by allowing choosy females to optimize costs and benefits of each resistance. Both parts of the extended parasite hypothesis suggest that female choice for specific heritable matequalities aim to optimize the resistance genetics of the unfertilized eggs. However, intersexual selection could go further than just choosing a mate. Here, I list the possible selection levels at which the mother and/or her ova could select for specific sperm haplotypes before, during and after the formation of the zygote. For many of these possible selection levels, evidence suggests that selection after mating might favour heterozygosity or even certain specific allele combinations at loci which are involved in the parasite-host co-evolution (e.g. the major histocompatibility complex or the transferrin locus).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7708826     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  18 in total

1.  Female multiple mating behaviour, early reproductive failure and litter size variation in mammals.

Authors:  P Stockley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Darwinian medicine: applications of evolutionary biology for veterinarians.

Authors:  Edmund K LeGrand; Corrie C Brown
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Wyatt W Anderson; Cynthia K Bluhm; Lee C Drickamer; Yong-Kyu Kim; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  MHC-genotype of progeny influenced by parental infection.

Authors:  T Rülicke; M Chapuisat; F R Homberger; E Macas; C Wedekind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sexual selection by female immunity against paternal antigens can fix loss of function alleles.

Authors:  Darius Ghaderi; Stevan A Springer; Fang Ma; Miriam Cohen; Patrick Secrest; Rachel E Taylor; Ajit Varki; Pascal Gagneux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The T-cell-mediated immune response and return rate of fledgling American kestrels are positively correlated with parental clutch size.

Authors:  J L Tella; G R Bortolotti; R D Dawson; M G Forero
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  No evidence for MHC class II-based non-random mating at the gametic haplotype in Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  M Promerová; G Alavioon; S Tusso; R Burri; S Immler
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  No evidence of sperm selection by female common shrews.

Authors:  P Stockley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering.

Authors:  D Penn; W Potts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?

Authors:  C Wedekind; S Füri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.