Literature DB >> 7708189

Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with isotonic dimeric (iodixanol) and monomeric (iohexol) nonionic contrast media: radiographic, clinical and neurophysiological evaluation.

R E Hekster1, H H Morré, P Cleyndert, J Zapletal, L F Sinnige, B Bolstad, Y Keetlapper.   

Abstract

Monomeric (iohexol 300 mg I/ml) and dimeric (iodixanol 270 mg I/ml) nonionic contrast media were compared in a double-blind, randomised, parallel group trial. Safety and efficacy of the media in intra-arterial cerebral digital subtraction angiography were evaluated by assessing adverse events, discomfort, EEG, heart rate and quality of radiodiagnostic information. Seventy-six patients underwent selective injection of the carotid and/or vertebral arteries. Both contrast media were well tolerated. No serious adverse events occurred. No effects on heart rate and EEG were evident. The arteriograms were of high quality and overall diagnostic information was optimal in 94% of the examinations. No clinically important differences between the two contrast media were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7708189     DOI: 10.1007/bf00588519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  7 in total

1.  EEG, ECG and other recordings in cerebral angiography.

Authors:  K Talle; A Lundervold
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1974-05

2.  Risk-decreasing factors in the angiographic examination of intracranial haemorrhage.

Authors:  R E Hekster
Journal:  Diagn Imaging       Date:  1979

3.  Iohexol compared to meglumine-Ca-metrizoate in common carotid angiography. A randomized double blind cross-over study in man.

Authors:  P Nakstad; O Sortland; O Aaserud
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  ECG changes during cerebral angiography; a comparison of low osmolality contrast media.

Authors:  M Mitsumori; K Hayakawa; M Abe
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Iodixanol in femoral arteriography (phase III): a comparative double-blind parallel trial between iodixanol and iopromide.

Authors:  N D Pugh; G R Sissons; M S Ruttley; K J Berg; J O Nossen; H Eide
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Cerebral angiography with non-ionic (metrizamide) and ionic (meglumine metrizoate) watersoluble contrast media. A comparative study with double blind technic.

Authors:  I O Skalpe; A Lundervold; K Tjorstad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1977-08-25       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Iodixanol in cardioangiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Tolerability, cardiac and renal effects.

Authors:  N E Kløw; K Levorstad; K J Berg; U Brodahl; K Endresen; D T Kristoffersen; B Laake; S Simonsen; A J Tofte; B Lundby
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.990

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Patient discomfort associated with the use of intra-arterial iodinated contrast media: a meta-analysis of comparative randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Peter A McCullough; Patrizio Capasso
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.930

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.