Literature DB >> 7707964

Looking at Drosophila mitotic chromosomes.

M Gatti1, S Bonaccorsi, S Pimpinelli.   

Abstract

The repertoire of cytological procedures described in the present paper permits full analysis of brain neuroblast chromosomes. Moreover, if brains are cultured for 13 hr in the presence of 5-bromo-2'-deoxy-uridine, our fixation and Hoechst staining protocols allow visualization of sister chromatid differentiation and the scoring of sister chromatid exchanges (Gatti et al., 1979). Finally, we note that our cytological procedures can be successfully employed for preparation and staining of gonial cells of both sexes and male meiotic chromosomes (Ripoll et al., 1985; our unpublished results). Good chromosome preparations of female meiosis are obtained with the procedure described by Davring and Sunner (1977, 1979), Nokkala and Puro (1976), and Puro and Nokkala (1977). In this chapter, we have focused on the organization and behavior of Drosophila mitotic chromosomes, describing a repertoire of cytological techniques for neuroblast chromosome preparations. We have not considered the numerous excellent cytological procedures for embryonic chromosome preparations (for an example, see Foe and Alberts, 1985; Foe, 1989), because these chromosomes are usually less clearly defined than those of larval neuroblasts. In addition, we have not included the whole-mount and squashing techniques that allow chromosome visualization and spindle immunostaining of neuroblast cells (Axton et al., 1990; Gonzalez et al., 1990), male meiotic cells (Casal et al.. 1990; Cenci et al., 1994), and female meiotic cells (Theurkauf and Hawley. 1992), because the fixation methods used in these procedures alter chromosome morphology. Fixation methods for antibody staining result in poorly defined chromosomes, whereas the methanol/acetic acid fixation techniques, such as those described here, preserve very well chromosome morphology but remove a substantial fraction of chromosomal proteins. Thus, one of the major technical breakthroughs in Drosophila mitotic cytology will be the development of fixation procedures that maximize chromosomal quality with minimal removal of proteins. This will be particularly useful for precise immunolocalization of heterochromatic proteins, including those associated with the centromere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7707964     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60924-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Cell Biol        ISSN: 0091-679X            Impact factor:   1.441


  48 in total

1.  mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development.

Authors:  M H Brodsky; J J Sekelsky; G Tsang; R S Hawley; G M Rubin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  The size and internal structure of a heterochromatic block determine its ability to induce position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E V Tolchkov; V I Rasheva; S Bonaccorsi; T Westphal; V A Gvozdev
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Efficient recovery of centric heterochromatin P-element insertions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christopher M Yan; Kenneth W Dobie; Hiep D Le; Alexander Y Konev; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A high proportion of genes involved in position effect variegation also affect chromosome inheritance.

Authors:  Hiep D Le; Kathryn M Donaldson; Kevin R Cook; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  MAX, a novel retrotransposon of the BEL-Pao family, is nested within the Bari1 cluster at the heterochromatic h39 region of chromosome 2 in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R M Marsano; S Marconi; R Moschetti; P Barsanti; C Caggese; R Caizzi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  FISH analysis of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin using BACs and P elements.

Authors:  Nicoletta Corradini; Fabrizio Rossi; Fiammetta Vernì; Patrizio Dimitri
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  COM, a heterochromatic locus governing the control of independent endogenous retroviruses from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sophie Desset; Carine Meignin; Bernard Dastugue; Chantal Vaury
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Bypassing the Greatwall-Endosulfine pathway: plasticity of a pivotal cell-cycle regulatory module in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Min-Young Kim; Elisabetta Bucciarelli; Diane G Morton; Byron C Williams; Kristina Blake-Hodek; Claudia Pellacani; Jessica R Von Stetina; Xiaoqian Hu; Maria Patrizia Somma; Daniela Drummond-Barbosa; Michael L Goldberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The Differences Between Cis- and Trans-Gene Inactivation Caused by Heterochromatin in Drosophila.

Authors:  Yuriy A Abramov; Aleksei S Shatskikh; Oksana G Maksimenko; Silvia Bonaccorsi; Vladimir A Gvozdev; Sergey A Lavrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genomic distribution of retrotransposons 297, 1731, copia, mdg1 and roo in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  Julia Díaz-González; Ana Domínguez; Jesús Albornoz
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.