Literature DB >> 7707597

Cancer screening behaviors and attitudes of women in southeastern Minnesota.

T E Kottke1, M A Trapp, M M Fores, A W Kelly, S H Jung, P J Novotny, L A Panser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rates at which women received screening Papanicolaou tests, clinical breast examinations, and mammography and to determine the extent to which these women might be expected to respond to screening recommendations from their physicians.
DESIGN: Random-digit-dial telephone interviews conducted in January 1993.
SETTING: Fifteen counties in southeastern Minnesota.
SUBJECTS: A sample of 1019 women who completed the telephone interview. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported Papanicolaou test, clinical breast examination, and mammography screening rates, with verification from medical records for a randomly selected subsample of 200 respondents who reported having had a test within 1 year of the interview.
RESULTS: For women aged 18 years and older, 60% (95% confidence interval, +/- 3.4%) reported having had a Papanicolaou test within the preceding year. For women 40 years of age and older, 57% (95% confidence interval, +/- 3.5%) reported having had a clinical breast examination in the past year, and 46% (95% confidence interval, +/- 3.6%) reported having had a screening mammogram within 1 year. The verified 1-year Papanicolaou test and mammogram rates were 35% and 33%, respectively. More than 90% of the respondents expressed a willingness to have these tests if their physicians were to advise them that the tests were indicated. However, 53% and 54% of the respondents, respectively, said that they either did not care or did not want their physicians to remind them when they were due for a Papanicolaou test or a mammogram.
CONCLUSIONS: Although self-reported screening rates in this population meet Healthy People 2000 goals, verified rates were significantly below target levels. A substantial proportion of women in this population remain ambivalent about participating in cancer detection programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7707597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  13 in total

1.  Is language a barrier to the use of preventive services?

Authors:  S Woloshin; L M Schwartz; S J Katz; H G Welch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The use of mammography by survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  M R Andersen; N Urban
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The Latina Breast Cancer Control Study, year one: factors predicting screening mammography utilization by urban Latina women in Massachusetts.

Authors:  M B Laws; S J Mayo
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1998-08

4.  Improving screening for cancer in the primary care setting. Where do we need to go and how can we get there?

Authors:  D Atkins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 3. Physical, psychological and social harm.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Race and mammography use in two North Carolina counties.

Authors:  M S O'Malley; J A Earp; R P Harris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Influenza immunization in a managed care organization.

Authors:  A M Baker; B McCarthy; V F Gurley; M U Yood
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Knowledge of risk factors, beliefs and practices of female healthcare professionals towards breast cancer, Morocco.

Authors:  Samia Ghanem; Meriem Glaoui; Siham Elkhoyaali; Mohamed Mesmoudi; Saber Boutayeb; Hassan Errihani
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2011-10-13

9.  Knowledge of risk factors, beliefs and practices of female healthcare professionals towards breast cancer in a tertiary institution in Lagos, Nigeria.

Authors:  Nasiru A Ibrahim; Olumuyiwa O Odusanya
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Inconsistent self-reported mammography history: findings from the National Population Health Survey longitudinal cohort.

Authors:  Christina M Bancej; Colleen J Maxwell; Judy Snider
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.