Literature DB >> 7707150

Trough: peak ratio: the rationale behind the United States Food and Drug Administration recommendations.

R J Lipicky1.   

Abstract

TROUGH EFFECT: For most formulations of most antihypertensive drugs which are administered in a chronic multiple-dose regimen, one of the requirements for approval is an estimate of the magnitude of effect (decrease in blood pressure minus that elicited with a placebo) obtained just before the next dose is taken. This estimate of effect is generally referred to as the 'trough' effect and is, by conventional practice (although not required to be), usually the effect before the first morning dose. PEAK EFFECT: Another estimate of effect, which represents the maximum effect of any single dose administered during a multiple-dose regimen, is strongly recommended for most drugs for most indications. This estimate of effect is generally referred to as the 'peak' effect and is, by conventional practice, usually the effect of the first morning dose measured a few hours after the dose is taken. TROUGH: PEAK RATIO: The two measurements, trough and peak, are intended to estimate the duration of effect of a single dose. Generally, if 50-75% of the peak effect of a dose is preserved at trough, issues concerning the proper dosing interval do not arise. The closer to no loss of effect throughout the dosing interval the better.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7707150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl        ISSN: 0952-1178


  8 in total

Review 1.  Guiding antihypertensive treatment decisions using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Blood pressure variability: its measurement and significance in hypertension.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Andrea Faini; Mariaconsuelo Valentini
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  The implications of noncompliance with antihypertensive medication.

Authors:  B Girvin; G D Johnston
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Blood pressure variability: assessment, predictive value, and potential as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: from old concepts to novel insights.

Authors:  Mehmet Kanbay; Kultigin Turkmen; Tevfik Ecder; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  All thiazide-like diuretics are not chlorthalidone: putting the ACCOMPLISH study into perspective.

Authors:  Michael E Ernst; Barry L Carter; Jan N Basile
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  2013 Korean Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension. Part II-treatments of hypertension.

Authors:  Jinho Shin; Jeong Bae Park; Kwang-Il Kim; Ju Han Kim; Dong Heon Yang; Wook Bum Pyun; Young Gweon Kim; Gheun-Ho Kim; Shung Chull Chae
Journal:  Clin Hypertens       Date:  2015-04-08

8.  2018 Korean Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension: part II-diagnosis and treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Hae-Young Lee; Jinho Shin; Gheun-Ho Kim; Sungha Park; Sang-Hyun Ihm; Hyun Chang Kim; Kwang-Il Kim; Ju Han Kim; Jang Hoon Lee; Jong-Moo Park; Wook Bum Pyun; Shung Chull Chae
Journal:  Clin Hypertens       Date:  2019-08-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.