Literature DB >> 7707002

Birth weight and special educational needs: effects of an increase in the survival of very low birthweight infants in London.

S T Kempley1, F S Diffley, G Ruiz, D Lowe, B G Evans, H R Gamsu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the contribution of children with different birth weights to special educational needs within a single health district, and to determine whether this pattern changed over the time when the survival of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants was increasing.
SETTING: An inner London health district. STUDY
DESIGN: A cohort of children born to local parents between January 1974 and December 1980 was selected from birth notifications, including only those infants who survived for more than one month. Community child health records were then inspected to identify children from the cohort who had been formally assessed for special educational needs before their 8th birthday. The risk of special educational needs was compared for the years 1974-77 and 1977-80 (the first and second halves of the period studied).
SUBJECTS: The infant cohort consisted of 31,846 children. Altogether 260 (0.8%) of these were later assessed formally.
RESULTS: VLBW infants were 4.4 times more likely to be assessed than normal birthweight infants. Formal assessment within the district occurred in three of 68 VLBW infants from the first half of the period studied, and three of 120 from the second half.
CONCLUSION: Although VLBW infants are at higher risk, an increase in their survival was not associated with any increase in their contribution to the group with special educational needs within our district. Their contribution, as a group, to the total number of children with special educational needs is very small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7707002      PMCID: PMC1060071          DOI: 10.1136/jech.49.1.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal follow-up of very low birthweight/extremely low birthweight infants to school age: a critical overview.

Authors:  M Ornstein; A Ohlsson; J Edmonds; E Asztalos
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1991 Aug-Sep

2.  Costs and benefits of neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  P O Pharoah; R C Stevenson; R W Cooke; B Sandu
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Outcome for infants of very low birthweight: survey of world literature.

Authors:  A L Stewart; E O Reynolds; A P Lipscomb
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A population-based evaluation of sustained mechanical ventilation of newborn babies.

Authors:  C R Maddock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-11-28       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Survival and morbidity in a geographically defined population of low birthweight infants.

Authors:  T G Powell; P O Pharoah; R W Cooke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Cerebral palsy and severe educational subnormality in low-birthweight children: a comparison of births in 1951-53 and 1970-73.

Authors:  E Alberman; J Benson; A McDonald
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prognosis for low-birthweight infants up to the age of 14: a population study.

Authors:  P Rantakallio; L von Wendt
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 8.  Prediction of five-year Stanford-Binet scores in preterm infants.

Authors:  S E Cohen; A H Parmelee
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1983-10
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Educational and behavioural problems in babies of 32-35 weeks gestation.

Authors:  C L Huddy; A Johnson; P L Hope
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Very low birthweight boys at the age of 19.

Authors:  A Ericson; B Källén
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.747

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.