Literature DB >> 7706703

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in normotensive children.

E Lurbe1, J Redon, Y Liao, J Tacons, R S Cooper, V Alvarez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess reference values of ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive children. SUBJECTS AND
DESIGN: Twenty-four-hour non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was carried out in 241 healthy normotensive children aged from 6 to 16 years (126 boys, mean +/- SD age 11.2 +/- 2.7 years; 115 girls, mean +/- SD age 10.9 +/- 2.9 years). The subjects were subdivided into three age-sex groups: 6-9, 10-12 and 13-16 years.
SETTING: Primary care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ABPM was performed using an oscillometric device (SpaceLabs model 90207) and appropriate cuff size during a regular school day. Blood pressure was measured every 20 min from 0600 to 2400 h, and thereafter every 30 min. At each monitoring session the following parameters were calculated for both systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP): means and centiles for 24-h, daytime (0800-2200 h) and night-time (2400-0600 h); circadian variability, estimated as the blood pressure fall between the day and the night periods and the day: night ratio; and load, as the percentage of measurements above the age- and sex-specific 95th centile (P95).
RESULTS: The upper limits of 'normality' for the mean of 24-h SBP and DBP estimated as the P95 in each age subgroup were 121/71 and 119/71 mmHg, 123/78 and 120/74 mmHg, and 124/78 and 125/75 mmHg, for boys and girls, respectively. A progressive increase in SBP with age was observed in both sexes, in contrast, DBP was similar throughout the age range. A nocturnal blood pressure fall of approximately 11 mmHg was observed for both SBP and DBP in all subgroups. The day:night ratio was 1.12 and 1.22 for SBP and DBP, respectively. The upper limit of blood pressure load, estimated as the P95 in all children, was 39% for SBP and 26% for DBP. A significant positive correlation was observed between casual blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (SBP: r = 0.61, P < 0.0001; DBP: r = 0.31, P < 0.0001). In general, mean ambulatory blood pressure, during the 24-h or the daytime period, was higher than casual blood pressure for both SBP and DBP.
CONCLUSION: ABPM is feasible in children, and the values obtained are useful as a departure point in establishing reference values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7706703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  16 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of high blood pressure in children by means of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  E Lurbe; J Redon
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Strengths and limitations of current pediatric blood pressure nomograms: a global overview with a special emphasis on regional differences in neonates and infants.

Authors:  Massimiliano Cantinotti; Raffaele Giordano; Marco Scalese; Sabrina Molinaro; Bruno Murzi; Nadia Assanta; Maura Crocetti; Marco Marotta; Sergio Ghione; Giorgio Iervasi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 3.  Discrepancies in office and ambulatory blood pressure in adolescents: help or hindrance?

Authors:  Empar Lurbe; Josep Redon
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents: coming of age?

Authors:  Empar Lurbe; María Isabel Torró; Julio Alvarez
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Using simplified blood pressure tables to avoid underdiagnosing childhood hypertension.

Authors:  Ajay P Sharma; Javed Mohammed; Benson Thomas; Ram N Singh; Guido Filler
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  Utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents.

Authors:  John W Graves; Mohammed Mahdi Althaf
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  When should essential hypertension in childhood be treated and how?

Authors:  C Loirat
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Reflux nephropathy and hypertension: correlation with the progression of renal damage.

Authors:  Giuliana Lama; Michele Adolfo Tedesco; Luisa Graziano; Elvira Calabrese; Carolina Grassia; Francesco Natale; Giuseppe Pacileo; Pier Francesco Rambaldi; Maria Esposito-Salsano
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 9.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a versatile tool for evaluating and managing hypertension in children.

Authors:  Alisa A Acosta; Karen L McNiece
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Blood pressure and cardiovascular involvement in children with neurofibromatosis type1.

Authors:  Giuliana Lama; Luisa Graziano; Elvira Calabrese; Carolina Grassia; Pier Francesco Rambaldi; Fabrizio Cioce; Michele Adolfo Tedesco; Giovanni Di Salvo; Maria Esposito-Salsano
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.