Literature DB >> 7705763

The kinetics of insulin administration by insulin pens.

B H Ginsberg1, J L Parkes, C Sparacino.   

Abstract

Insulin pens deliver insulin more slowly than syringes because of compressible elements of the insulin cartridges, especially air bubbles. The time required for a pen to deliver 20 Units of insulin increased with increasing air in the cartridge as determined by two independent techniques. The first technique involved no back pressure and was done by injection of [125I]-iodoinsulin onto absorbent paper on a constant angular velocity turntable. The second technique involved the normal back pressure of subcutaneous tissue and was done by robotic, timed injections of [125I]-iodoinsulin into full thickness pigskin. Air dramatically reduced the delivery of insulin in the five seconds that patients normally wait for injection by an insulin pen. Accumulation of more than 50 microliters of air results in a delivery of an unacceptably low percentage of insulin: with 200 microliters of air, a patient would get only 37% of the expected dose. Thus, a patient who injects 20 Units of insulin and withdraws the needle after the recommended 5 seconds would receive only 7.4 Units if there were 200 microliters of air in the cartridge. Since we found that 42 of 50 commercially available insulin cartridges contained air bubbles at purchase (average estimated to be 50 microliters), additional air entering the cartridge could lead to serious underdosing. Previous studies have demonstrated that air accumulates in insulin cartridges when the needle is left on the pen between injections. Therefore, for safety reasons, patients should be strongly advised to remove the needle immediately after each injection as recommended by the manufacturer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7705763     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1001764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Metab Res        ISSN: 0018-5043            Impact factor:   2.936


  5 in total

1.  Accuracy and reproducibility of low dose insulin administration using pen-injectors and syringes.

Authors:  M G Gnanalingham; P Newland; C P Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Indian Injection Technique Study: Population Characteristics and Injection Practices.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Ambrish Mithal; Rakesh Sahay; Mathew John; A G Unnikrishnan; Banshi Saboo; Sujoy Ghosh; Debmalya Sanyal; Laurence J Hirsch; Vandita Gupta; Kenneth W Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Assessment of Insulin Injection Practice of Nurses Working in a Tertiary Healthcare Center of Nepal.

Authors:  Shital Adhikari; Ramesh Sharma Poudel; Laxmi Rajbanshi; Shakti Shrestha
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2018-08-01

4.  Assessment of Insulin Injection Practice among Diabetes Patients in a Tertiary Healthcare Centre in Nepal: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Ramesh Sharma Poudel; Shakti Shrestha; Rano Mal Piryani; Bijaya Basyal; Kalpana Kaucha; Shital Adhikari
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 4.011

Review 5.  Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations, India: The Indian Recommendations for Best Practice in Insulin Injection Technique, 2017.

Authors:  Nikhil Tandon; Sanjay Kalra; Yatan Pal Singh Balhara; Manash P Baruah; Manoj Chadha; Hemraj B Chandalia; K M Prasanna Kumar; S V Madhu; Ambrish Mithal; Rakesh Sahay; Rishi Shukla; Annamalai Sundaram; Ambika G Unnikrishnan; Banshi Saboo; Vandita Gupta; Subhankar Chowdhury; Jothydev Kesavadev; Subhash K Wangnoo
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.