Literature DB >> 7702813

An outcomes study of cochlear implants in deaf patients. Audiologic, economic, and quality-of-life changes.

J P Harris1, J P Anderson, R Novak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate and quantitate the changes in economic, emotional, and health-related quality of life after cochlear implantation.
SUBJECTS: Nine patients between the ages of 18 and 60 years who qualified for surgery.
METHODS: Patients underwent assessment using four socioeconomic indicator scales administered preoperatively, and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 30 months, and 3 years postoperatively. All patients continued to use their cochlear implants during the 3-year follow-up period.
RESULTS: Uniform and systematic improvement in quality of life and psychologic well-being, and a steady increase in mean personal income for the group that underwent implantation, supporting the contention that cochlear implantation is a beneficial surgical procedure for profoundly deaf patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7702813     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890040024004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  9 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire into Italian.

Authors:  F Ottaviani; E Iacona; V Sykopetrites; A Schindler; F Mozzanica
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life and hearing aids: a tutorial.

Authors:  Harvey B Abrams; Theresa H Chisolm; Rachel McArdle
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

3.  'Transforming' self and world: a phenomenological study of a changing lifeworld following a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Linda Finlay; Patricia Molano-Fisher
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-12-04

4.  Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  R Nunes
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-08

5.  Spiral ganglion neuron survival and function in the deafened cochlea following chronic neurotrophic treatment.

Authors:  Thomas G Landry; Andrew K Wise; James B Fallon; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The cost of cochlear implantation: a review of methodological considerations.

Authors:  Costa Nadège; Garnault Valérie; Ferlicoq Laura; Derumeaux-Burel Hélène; Bongard Vanina; Deguine Olivier; Fraysse Bernard; Molinier Laurent
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-17

Review 7.  Targeting cholesterol homeostasis to fight hearing loss: a new perspective.

Authors:  Brigitte Malgrange; Isabel Varela-Nieto; Philippe de Medina; Michael R Paillasse
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire into Turkish language: validity, reliability and effects of demographic variables.

Authors:  Asuman Alnıaçık; Eda Çakmak; Okan Öz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.236

Review 9.  Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature.

Authors:  Krupa R Patel; David J Phillips; Jason M Leibowitz; Theresa Scognamiglio; Victoria E Banuchi; William I Kuhel; David I Kutler; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-01-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.