Literature DB >> 7702595

Are there DNA damage checkpoints in E. coli?

B A Bridges1.   

Abstract

The concept of regulatory 'checkpoints' in the eukaryotic cycle has proved to be a fruitful one. Here, its applicability to the bacterial cell cycle is examined. A primitive DNA damage checkpoint operates in E. coli such that, after exposure to ultraviolet light, while excision repair occurs, chromosome replication continues very slowly with the production of discontinuous daughter strands. The slower the rate of excision of photoproducts, the greater the delay before the normal rate of DNA replication is restored, the additional time for repair ensuring that normal survival is maintained. A model is proposed in which replication rate is controlled by the ratio of RecA-coated to uncoated single stranded regions of DNA in the replication fork. There are also two cell division inhibitors SulA (= SfiA) and SfiC under the control of the SOS system and sensitive to DNA damage, but they are irrelevant to the survival of wild-type bacteria under normal conditions. In strains where SulA and SfiC do not operate, inhibition is not influenced by the rate of excision repair and so fails one of the criteria for a DNA damage checkpoint, namely the monitoring of the DNA for the level of residual damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7702595     DOI: 10.1002/bies.950170112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  11 in total

1.  A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  T Opperman; S Murli; B T Smith; G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Historical overview: searching for replication help in all of the rec places.

Authors:  M M Cox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  YneA, an SOS-induced inhibitor of cell division in Bacillus subtilis, is regulated posttranslationally and requires the transmembrane region for activity.

Authors:  Allison H Mo; William F Burkholder
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A role for the umuDC gene products of Escherichia coli in increasing resistance to DNA damage in stationary phase by inhibiting the transition to exponential growth.

Authors:  S Murli; T Opperman; B T Smith; G C Walker
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Mutagenesis and more: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS response.

Authors:  B T Smith; G C Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda.

Authors:  A Kuzminov
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  An alternative pathway of recombination of chromosomal fragments precedes recA-dependent recombination in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans.

Authors:  M J Daly; K W Minton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The SOS Regulatory Network.

Authors:  Lyle A Simmons; James J Foti; Susan E Cohen; Graham C Walker
Journal:  EcoSal Plus       Date:  2008-07-25

9.  DNA damage checkpoint activation affects peptidoglycan synthesis and late divisome components in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Emily A Masser; Peter E Burby; Wayne D Hawkins; Brooke R Gustafson; Justin S Lenhart; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.979

10.  Recombinase and translesion DNA polymerase decrease the speed of replication fork progression during the DNA damage response in Escherichia coli cells.

Authors:  Kang Wei Tan; Tuan Minh Pham; Asako Furukohri; Hisaji Maki; Masahiro Tatsumi Akiyama
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.