Literature DB >> 7701391

Reporting of acute low back pain in a telephone interview. Identification of potential biases.

T S Carey1, J Garrett, A Jackman, L Sanders, W Kalsbeek.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was a survey of 235 individuals with and 132 individuals without documented low back pain.
OBJECTIVES: To approximate the magnitude of potential reporting biases in estimates of prevalence of and medical care use in low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of survey techniques presents several possible biases in the reporting of acute symptoms. These biases are especially pertinent in musculoskeletal symptoms, which often are recurrent and not life-threatening.
METHODS: Two-hundred-thirty-five patients with acute low back pain were contacted by telephone 4-16 months after their physician visit and surveyed regarding the presence and date of back pain episodes. One-hundred-thirty-two patients who had no functionally disabling back pain on physician interview were interviewed.
RESULTS: Of the patients who had sought care for back pain, 21% indicated they had not had back pain when interviewed 4-16 months later. Episodes of pain that occurred more than 8 months before the interview tended to be recalled as occurring more recently than they actually occurred, confirming "forward telescoping" of the illness episode. Only 3% of the individuals without functionally impairing pain reported such pain on a separate interview.
CONCLUSIONS: Lack of recall occurs regarding acute low back pain, usually a self-limited illness. This potential under-estimate of back pain prevalence may be balanced by forward telescoping of the date of illness occurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7701391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Acute symptoms related to air pollution in urban areas: a study protocol.

Authors:  Masud Yunesian; Fariba Asghari; Javad Homayoun Vash; Mohammad Hossein Forouzanfar; Dariush Farhud
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Aetiology of low back pain in Mulago Hospital, Uganda.

Authors:  Moses Galukande; Stephen Muwazi; Didace B Mugisa
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Data equivalency of an interactive voice response system for home assessment of back pain and function.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Santosh K Verma
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Agreement of self-reported medical history: comparison of an in-person interview with a self-administered questionnaire.

Authors:  Manuela M Bergmann; Eric J Jacobs; Kurt Hoffmann; Heiner Boeing
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Sacroplasty versus vertebroplasty: comparable clinical outcomes for the treatment of fracture-related pain.

Authors:  C T Whitlow; B J Mussat-Whitlow; C W T Mattern; M D Baker; P P Morris
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Recall Bias in Low Back Pain Among Workers: Effects of Recall Period and Individual and Work-Related Factors.

Authors:  Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen; Andreas Holtermann; Marie Birk Jørgensen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Development of the young spine questionnaire.

Authors:  Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Lise Hestbaek
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.