Literature DB >> 7701149

Sample sizes for phase II clinical trials derived from Bayesian decision theory.

H C Brunier1, J Whitehead.   

Abstract

In early phase clinical trials of a new medical treatment, patients are treated to decide whether there is sufficient promise to justify additional studies. A decision theoretic approach is proposed to help determine the number of patients that should be treated. The optimal sample size is obtained by maximizing a utility function which incorporates both the number of 'gained successes' and the costs of treatment. The method extends work of Sylvester and Staquet, and adopts a Bayesian formulation. Numbers of patients in later studies and in eventual routine use of the treatment are taken into account. We allow for the possibility that a later study might lead to an erroneous conclusion. The effects of these various influences on the recommended sampling plan for the early phase clinical trial are explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7701149     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780132312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

Review 1.  Trials and fast changing technologies: the case for tracker studies.

Authors:  R J Lilford; D A Braunholtz; R Greenhalgh; S J Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-01

2.  Bayesian design for two-arm randomized Phase II clinical trials with endpoints from the exponential family using multiple constraints.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Jo A Wick; Jianghua He; Jonathan D Mahnken; Matthew S Mayo
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Bayesian decision theoretic two-stage design in phase II clinical trials with survival endpoint.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Jeremy M G Taylor; Scott M Schuetze
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review.

Authors:  Siew Wan Hee; Thomas Hamborg; Simon Day; Jason Madan; Frank Miller; Martin Posch; Sarah Zohar; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.021

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.