Literature DB >> 7700272

DNA probes and PCR in diagnosis of mycoplasma infections.

S Razin1.   

Abstract

Laboratory diagnosis of mycoplasma infections is hampered by the difficulty or total failure to cultivate the organisms in vitro, and by the frequently weak and poorly specific serological response of the host. DNA probes consisting of cloned ribosomal RNA genes, cDNA to mycoplasmal rRNA, synthetic 16S rRNA oligonucleotide sequences, or cloned mycoplasmal protein genes, have been developed and applied as diagnostic tools in a variety of human and animal mycoplasma infections. These included primary atypical pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae, urogenital infections associated with M. genitalium and Ureaplasma urealyticum, and infections with M. fermentans, M. penetrans or M. pirum--mycoplasmas recently incriminated as cofactors in AIDS. DNA probes were also designed to aid in diagnosis of mycoplasma diseases of farm and laboratory animals, and the hard-to-diagnose mycoplasma infections of cell cultures. Sensitivity of mycoplasma detection by the different probes ranged between 10(3) and 10(6) colony-forming units, a level which may not be sufficiently high for use in a clinical laboratory. The introduction of PCR has pushed aside the previously developed DNA probes, by providing faster and much more sensitive tests. The sensitive level of a PCR test can be as low as a single organism, enabling detection of mycoplasmas in patients treated with antibiotics and in asymptomatic patients. PCR becomes positive prior to serological response and is also effective in immunocompromised hosts. PCR was shown to be most valuable in detection and identification of the non-culturable plant and insect mycoplasma-like organisms (MLOs). Nevertheless, false-negative PCR results are rather common due to inhibitors of the PCR reaction in the clinical specimen, while false-positive results may occur due to contamination of the reagents with target DNA. In conclusion, the PCR procedure is still too complex to be carried out in a routine diagnostic laboratory. PCR prepackaged quality-controlled diagnostic kits are now in the process of rapid development. Once these kits become available, and at a reasonable cost, PCR will certainly take its place as a major diagnostic tool in the routine diagnosis of mycoplasma infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7700272     DOI: 10.1006/mcpr.1994.1071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Probes        ISSN: 0890-8508            Impact factor:   2.365


  26 in total

Review 1.  Primer mixture enhances PCR detection of Mycoplasma/Acholeplasma contaminants in cell cultures.

Authors:  J Tang; M Hu; S Lee; R Roblin
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of immunoglobulin G reactive with a recombinant protein expressed from the gene encoding the 116-kilodalton protein of Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Authors:  M F Duffy; K G Whithear; A H Noormohammadi; P F Markham; M Catton; J Leydon; G F Browning
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Molecular diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  K Loens; D Ursi; H Goossens; M Ieven
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Mycoplasma pneumoniae detection with PCR in renal tissue of a patient with acute glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  María del Carmen Laso; María Estela Cadario; Laura Haymes; Irene Grimoldi; Ziomara Balbarrey; Enrique Casanueva
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Molecular approaches to diagnosis of pulmonary diseases due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Authors:  M Abele-Horn; U Busch; H Nitschko; E Jacobs; R Bax; F Pfaff; B Schaffer; J Heesemann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Real-time PCR assay is superior to other methods for the detection of mycoplasma contamination in the cell lines of the National Cell Bank of Iran.

Authors:  Vahid Molla Kazemiha; Shahin Bonakdar; Amir Amanzadeh; Shahram Azari; Arash Memarnejadian; Shirin Shahbazi; Mohammad Ali Shokrgozar; Reza Mahdian
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 7.  Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen.

Authors:  Ken B Waites; Deborah F Talkington
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Ellipsometric-based novel DNA biosensor for label-free, real-time detection of Bordetella parapertussis.

Authors:  S Rafique; M Idrees; H Bokhari; A S Bhatti
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 1.365

9.  Comparative analysis and serovar-specific identification of multiple-banded antigen genes of Ureaplasma urealyticum biovar 1.

Authors:  F Kong; X Zhu; W Wang; X Zhou; S Gordon; G L Gilbert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of polymerase chain reaction assay with culture for detection of genital mycoplasmas in perinatal infections.

Authors:  N Luki; P Lebel; M Boucher; B Doray; J Turgeon; R Brousseau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.