Literature DB >> 7698948

The in vitro uptake and metabolism of peptides and amino acids by five species of rumen bacteria.

J R Ling1, I P Armstead.   

Abstract

Streptococcus bovis JB1, Prevotella ruminicola B(1)4, Selenomonas ruminantium Z108, Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and Anaerovibrio lipolytica 5S were incubated with either 14C-peptides (mol. wt, 200-1000) or 14C-amino acids to compare their rates of uptake and metabolism. In experiment 1, the bacteria were grown and incubated in a complex medium, but no uptake of 14C-labelled substrates occurred. When casein digest was omitted, uptake rates of 14C-peptides were different (P < 0.01) with each species, but nil for 14C-amino acids. In experiment 2, to minimize the effects of non-radiolabelled peptides and amino acids, defined and semi-defined media were used. Patterns of 14C-peptide uptake resembled those of experiment 1. The 5-min rate for Strep. bovis JB1 was almost twice that of P. ruminicola B(1)4, though by 15 min they were similar and threefold greater than other species; that of A. lipolytica 5S was especially low. Incubations with 14C-amino acids resulted in a wide range (P < 0.01) of uptake rates; after 5 min P. ruminicola B(1)4 possessed the lowest and Strep. bovis JB1 the highest, but after 15 min, that of Sel. ruminantium Z108 was even higher. All bacteria, with the exception of P. ruminicola B(1)4, assimilated 14C-amino acids faster (P < 0.01) than 14C-peptides. Only Strep. bovis JB1 and P. ruminicola B(1)4 were capable of extensively metabolizing 14C-peptides, but all five species metabolized 14C-amino acids; there was evidence of substantial degradation and some synthesis. Calculations suggest that peptides could supply up to 43%, and amino acids 62% of the N requirements of rumen bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7698948     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb02831.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-8847


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Fibrobacteres: an important phylum of cellulose-degrading bacteria.

Authors:  Emma Ransom-Jones; David L Jones; Alan J McCarthy; James E McDonald
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Incorporation of [(15)N] ammonia by the cellulolytic ruminal bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes BL2, Ruminococcus albus SY3, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens 17.

Authors:  C Atasoglu; C J Newbold; R J Wallace
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  De novo synthesis of amino acids by the ruminal bacteria Prevotella bryantii B14, Selenomonas ruminantium HD4, and Streptococcus bovis ES1.

Authors:  C Atasoglu; C Valdés; N D Walker; C J Newbold; R J Wallace
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Association of residual feed intake with abundance of ruminal bacteria and biopolymer hydrolyzing enzyme activities during the peripartal period and early lactation in Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  Ahmed A Elolimy; José M Arroyo; Fernanda Batistel; Michael A Iakiviak; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-14

5.  Dramatic Remodeling of the Gut Microbiome Around Parturition and Its Relationship With Host Serum Metabolic Changes in Sows.

Authors:  Xiaochang Huang; Jun Gao; Yuanzhang Zhao; Maozhang He; Shanlin Ke; Jinyuan Wu; Yunyan Zhou; Hao Fu; Hui Yang; Congying Chen; Lusheng Huang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Ruminal background of predisposed milk urea (MU) concentration in Holsteins.

Authors:  Hanne Honerlagen; Henry Reyer; Dierck Segelke; Carolin Beatrix Maria Müller; Marie Christin Prahl; Siriluck Ponsuksili; Nares Trakooljul; Norbert Reinsch; Björn Kuhla; Klaus Wimmers
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.064

7.  Ammonia production by human faecal bacteria, and the enumeration, isolation and characterization of bacteria capable of growth on peptides and amino acids.

Authors:  Anthony J Richardson; Nest McKain; R John Wallace
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.605

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.