Literature DB >> 7698698

Variables associated with the risk of colorectal adenomas in asymptomatic patients with a family history of colorectal cancer.

P Gaglia1, W S Atkin, S Whitelaw, I C Talbot, C B Williams, J M Northover, S V Hodgson.   

Abstract

The results of screening individuals referred to the Family Cancer Clinic at St Mark's Hospital from 1986 are presented. Colonoscopy was performed in 644 asymptomatic individuals (from 436 families) with a family history of colorectal cancer. Sixty nine (15.8%) of the families fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria for the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndromes (HNPCC). Seven cases of colorectal cancer were diagnosed at an average age of 49 years; six at Dukes's stage A and one at stage C, four in subjects from Amsterdam criteria families. One hundred and forty four (22.4%) subjects had one or more adenomas. The prevalence of adenomas in the subjects from Amsterdam criteria families was 34 of 127 (26.8%) compared with 110 of 517 (21.3%) in those from other families; the age and sex adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.76 (p = 0.02). Factors influencing the prevalence of adenomas in screened individuals were evaluated. Multivariate analysis showed that independent variables significantly related to the risk of adenomas were: age (p < 0.0001), sex (p = 0.0002), and the number of generations (> or = 2 v 1) of relatives affected by either colorectal cancer or adenomas (p = 0.0006). The latter variable was more highly predictive of the probability of finding an adenoma at colonoscopy than a family history of two generations with cancer only (p = 0.056). The OR of having colorectal adenomas increased with age, by about twofold for each decade, and was twice as high in men than women, and in subjects with two or more generations relative to those with one generation affected by colorectal cancer or adenomas. Six of seven patients with cancer and 46 of 144 (31.9%) with adenomas had lesions proximal to the splenic flexure only. The proportion of individuals with proximal adenomas only was 47.1% in Amsterdam criteria families and 27.3% in the others (p=0.03). These findings support the view that colonoscopy rather than sigmoidoscopy is the method of choice for screening high risk groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7698698      PMCID: PMC1382451          DOI: 10.1136/gut.36.3.385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  23 in total

1.  Colonoscopic screening for neoplasms in asymptomatic first-degree relatives of colon cancer patients. A controlled, prospective study.

Authors:  J G Guillem; K A Forde; M R Treat; A I Neugut; K M O'Toole; B E Diamond
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Colonoscopic screening of asymptomatic patients with a family history of colon cancer.

Authors:  J W Baker; J B Gathright; A E Timmcke; T C Hicks; B T Ferrari; J E Ray
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Hereditary proximal colonic cancer.

Authors:  P M Lynch; H T Lynch; R E Harris
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Family studies in cancer of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  E Lovett
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons with negative fecal occult blood tests.

Authors:  D K Rex; G A Lehman; R H Hawes; T M Ulbright; J J Smith
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Risk and surveillance of individuals with heritable factors for colorectal cancer. WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  R W Burt; D T Bishop; H T Lynch; P Rozen; S J Winawer
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Dominant inheritance of adenomatous colonic polyps and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R W Burt; D T Bishop; L A Cannon; M A Dowdle; R G Lee; M H Skolnick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies.

Authors:  F A Macrae; K G Tan; C B Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, average-risk men.

Authors:  J A DiSario; P G Foutch; H D Mai; K Pardy; R K Manne
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Aetiology of adenoma--carcinoma sequence in large bowel.

Authors:  M J Hill; B C Morson; H J Bussey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-02-04       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  16 in total

1.  Prevalence of any size adenomas and advanced adenomas in 40- to 49-year-old individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy because of a family history of colorectal carcinoma in a first-degree relative.

Authors:  Akshay K Gupta; Jewel Samadder; Eric Elliott; Saurabh Sethi; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Guidance on large bowel surveillance for people with two first degree relatives with colorectal cancer or one first degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer under 45 years.

Authors:  M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Molecular analysis of Iranian colorectal cancer patients at risk for Lynch syndrome: a new molecular, clinicopathological feature.

Authors:  Mehrdad Zeinalian; Mohammad Hassan Emami; Rasoul Salehi; Azar Naimi; Mohammad Kazemi; Morteza Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2015-06

4.  Five year colorectal cancer outcomes in a large negative CT colonography screening cohort.

Authors:  David H Kim; B Dustin Pooler; Jennifer M Weiss; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Colorectal neoplasms detected colonoscopically in at-risk members of colorectal cancer families stratified by the demonstration of DNA microsatellite instability.

Authors:  J R Jass; V Pokos; J L Arnold; D S Cottier; P Jeevaratnam; N S Van de Water; P J Browett; I M Winship; M R Lane
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Risk of colorectal adenomas in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer: some implications for screening programmes.

Authors:  J F Aitken; C J Bain; M Ward; V Siskind; R MacLennan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Screening colonoscopy in 40- to 50-year-old first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer is efficient: a controlled multicentre study.

Authors:  Markus Menges; Johannes Fischinger; Barbara Gärtner; Thomas Georg; Dietrich Woerdehoff; Matthias Maier; Matthias Harloff; Christa Stegmaier; Jochen Raedle; Martin Zeitz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Report of 16 kindreds and one kindred with hMLH1 germline mutation.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Zhen-Jun Wang; Yu-Feng Xu; Yuan-Lian Wan; Peng Li; Yan-Ting Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Colonoscopy surveillance of individuals at risk of familial colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N Bradshaw; S Holloway; I Penman; M G Dunlop; M E M Porteous
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Prevalence of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps in mismatch repair mutation carriers among CAPP2 participants: report by the colorectal adenoma/carcinoma prevention programme 2.

Authors:  Annelie Liljegren; Gail Barker; Faye Elliott; Lucio Bertario; Marie Luise Bisgaard; Diana Eccles; Gareth Evans; Finlay Macrae; Eamonn Maher; Annika Lindblom; Samuel Rotstein; Bo Nilsson; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Gabriela Möslein; Jeremy Jass; Riccardo Fodde; John Mathers; John Burn; D Timothy Bishop
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.