Literature DB >> 7697480

Comparison of a screening coronal CT versus a contiguous coronal CT for the evaluation of patients with presumptive sinusitis.

G M Goodman1, D S Martin, J Klein, E Awwad, H M Druce, M Sharafuddin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography has greatly improved the accuracy of sinus imaging. While contiguous coronal computed tomography scanning of the sinuses provides detailed imaging as compared with plain sinus radiography, this modality is significantly more expensive and involves exposure of the patient to a higher dose of radiation. It has become increasingly common to obtain screening, or non-contiguous, CT scans of the sinuses when screening for the presence of sinusitis.
OBJECTIVE: To calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the screening coronal CT scan of the sinuses in screening for inflammatory disease using the contiguous coronal CT examination of the sinuses as the standard.
METHODS: From contiguous coronal computed tomograms of the paranasal sinuses, screening coronal computed tomographic examinations were created for 44 patients. Patients were being screened for the presence of sinusitis in the Comprehensive Sinus Clinic at St. Louis University. The two examinations were reviewed independently and in random order by two neuroradiologists. Using the original examinations as the standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the screening studies were calculated for various situations.
RESULTS: Overall, a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 89.3% for the detection of inflammatory disease of the sinuses by the screening examination was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The screening coronal computed tomogram of the paranasal sinuses may be useful in the evaluation of the patient with possible sinusitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7697480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  5 in total

1.  Appropriate interslice gap for screening coronal paranasal sinus tomography for mucosal thickening.

Authors:  Can Alper Cagici; Cuneyt Yilmazer; Cem Hurcan; Cem Ozer; Fulya Ozer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  CT sinus and facial bones reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme.

Authors:  Paul Lockwood
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis in primary care: a systematic review of test accuracy.

Authors:  Mark H Ebell; Brian McKay; Ryan Guilbault; Yokabed Ermias
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Three-slice computerized tomography for the diagnosis and follow-up of rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Can Alper Cagici; Ozcan Cakmak; Cem Hurcan; Fahri Tercan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-02-26       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Limited CT Scan of Paranasal Sinuses in the Identification of Sinusitis.

Authors:  Vahid Noorian; Arya Motaghi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 0.611

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.