Literature DB >> 7697055

Ultrasonic evaluation of bladder neck position and mobility: the influence of urethral catheter, bladder volume, and body position.

L Mouritsen1, P Bach.   

Abstract

The influence of urethral catheter, bladder volume, and body position on the ultrasonic assessment of bladder neck position and mobility was evaluated in 24 incontinent women. The bladder neck position was described by two independent parameters: BS-distance, from the bladder neck to the lower tip of the symphysis pubis, and the rotation angle between the BS-line and the symphyseal middline. Catheterisation resulted in apposition of the bladder neck towards the symphysis pubis, seen as a significant shortening of the BS-distance in postmenopausal women without estrogen replacement. The rotation angle was unaffected. Increasing the bladder volume to symptomatically full resulted in increased capacity to withhold, since the rotation angle decreased 6.6 degrees. Examination in the sitting position, compared to the supine resulted in bladder neck descent to a "lower level," and the rotation angle increased in average 16 degrees. Bladder neck mobility was unaffected by catheterisation and body position. Vaginal ultrasonic evaluation of bladder neck suspension is recommended to be performed without a catheter, with a comfortably full bladder in a convenient, but standardised examination position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7697055     DOI: 10.1002/nau.1930130603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  10 in total

1.  Recommendations on functional sonography of the lower female urinary tract.

Authors:  M E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1996

2.  Correlation of perineal ultrasound and lateral chain urethrocystography in the anatomical evaluation of the bladder neck.

Authors:  Carolyn Troeger; Monika Gugger; Wolfgang Holzgreve; Edward Wight
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-11-20

Review 3.  Updated recommendations on ultrasonography in urogynecology.

Authors:  R Tunn; G Schaer; U Peschers; W Bader; A Gauruder; E Hanzal; H Koelbl; D Koelle; D Perucchini; E Petri; P Riss; B Schuessler; V Viereck
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-10-16

Review 4.  [Ultrasound in urogynecology].

Authors:  U Peschers; K Jundt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Recommendations of the German Association of Urogynecology on functional sonography of the lower female urinary tract.

Authors:  G Schaer; H Koelbl; R Voigt; E Merz; C Anthuber; R Niemeyer; G Ralph; W Bader; D Fink; E Grischke
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1996

6.  Functional sonography of the lower urinary tract.

Authors:  J Beco
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1996

7.  Prolapse assessment supine and standing: do we need different cutoffs for "significant prolapse"?

Authors:  Nuria-Laia Rodríguez-Mias; Nishamini Subramaniam; Talia Friedman; Ka Lai Shek; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Bladder neck evaluation by perineal ultrasound before and after reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Manabu Nishibayashi; Koichi Kobayashi; Akinori Miki; Ryugo Okagaki; Ichiro Nagata; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Osamu Ishihara
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.314

9.  Ultrasonography as a screening tool for paravaginal defects in women with stress incontinence: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Ostrzenski; N G Osborne
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

10.  A comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound (DTP-US) with dynamic evacuation proctography (DEP) in the diagnosis of cul de sac hernia (enterocele) in patients with evacuatory dysfunction.

Authors:  M Beer-Gabel; Y Assoulin; M Amitai; E Bardan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.571

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.