Literature DB >> 769219

Possible active enhancement of a human cadaver renal allograft with antilymphocyte serum (ALS) and donor bone marrow: case report of an initial attempt.

A P Monaco, A W Clark, M L Wood, A I Sahyoun, S D Codish, R W Brown.   

Abstract

Nonspecific immunosuppression of transplant patients frequently leads to complications which might be circumvented by inducing donor-specific immune unresponsiveness. Such specific immunosuppression has been produced experimentally, with use of donor antigen and antilymphocyte serum (ALS) for active enhancement. A case is presented in which the recipient of a cadaveric renal allograft (zero antigen match, cross-match negative) was given ALS (first 14 days after operation) and 11 X 10(9) donor bone marrow cells (twenty-fifth postoperative day) along with conventional doses of prednisone and Imuran in an attempt to produce donor-specific immune unresponsiveness. There were no rejection episodes, and serum creatinine remained less than 1.0 mg. per 100 ml. By the second month after transplantation there was no evidence for the persistence of donor erythrocytes or white cells. The conventional immunosuppressive agents were tapered and renal function was normal 8 months after transplantation, when the patient developed fatal peritonitis secondary to perforated sigmoid diverticulitis. At autopsy the renal allograft showed only minimal evidence of rejection. The present case illustrates an attempt to use ALS and donor bone marrow cells for active enhancement of a human cadaveric renal allograft. The infusion of stored donor marrow cells after transplantation is a particularly applicable technique for human cadaveric organ transplantation. The rejection-free course of this patient suggests that attempts to produce active enhancement clinically deserve further trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 769219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  39 in total

1.  Kidney transplantation with bone marrow augmentation: five-year outcomes.

Authors:  R Shapiro; A S Rao; R J Corry; M Valenti; A Zeevi; M L Jordan; V P Scantlebury; C A Vivas; A Jain; J McCauley; P Randhawa; E A Gray; I Dvorchik; J McMichael; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2001 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Transplantation tolerance from a historical perspective.

Authors:  T E Starzl; R M Zinkernagel
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 3.  Tolerance induction for solid organ grafts with donor-derived hematopoietic reconstitution.

Authors:  K L Gandy
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.829

4.  A 14-year experience with kidney transplantation.

Authors:  R Weil; G P Schröter; J C West; T E Starzl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Mixed chimerism and split tolerance: mechanisms and clinical correlations.

Authors:  David P Al-Adra; Colin C Anderson
Journal:  Chimerism       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec

6.  Hematopoietic cell transplantation for tolerance induction.

Authors:  N S Kenyon; C Ricordi
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 7.  Translating transplantation tolerance in the clinic: where are we, where do we go?

Authors:  M Goldman; K Wood
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Bone marrow augmentation in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  R Shapiro; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Induction of Pancreatic Islet Graft Acceptance: The Role of Antigen Presenting Cells.

Authors:  Camillo Ricordi; Suzanne T Ildstad; Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Sci       Date:  1992-04

10.  The basis of allograft acceptance.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  Forum (Genova)       Date:  1997
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.