Literature DB >> 7692097

Transurethral incision of the prostate: an objective and subjective evaluation of long-term efficacy.

L T Sirls1, K Ganabathi, P E Zimmern, D A Roskamp, G Wolde-Tsadik, G E Leach.   

Abstract

The emergence of less invasive therapies has demanded the reassessment of surgical procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. This study was designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of transurethral incision of the prostate using objective (urodynamic) and subjective (symptom score and assessment of satisfaction) parameters, and investigate sexual function. The results of transurethral incision of the prostate in 41 men (mean age 63.4 years) were reviewed, with a mean followup of 53 months (range 12 to 96). Preoperative symptom score (based on the Madsen-Iversen score) and urodynamic evaluation were compared to recent post-transurethral incision symptom score, urodynamic evaluation and interview to determine patient satisfaction. Total symptom score, as well as obstructive and irritative components, significantly decreased after transurethral incision of the prostate (p < 0.0001). Mean detrusor pressure at peak flow decreased from 85 to 44 cm. water (p < 0.0001) and mean maximal detrusor pressure decreased from 114 to 55 cm. water (p < 0.0001). Mean peak urine flow rates increased from 10.3 to 15.3 cc per second (p = 0.019). Of the men 32 (82%) reported long-term improvement after transurethral incision of the prostate, with an overall satisfaction rate of 67% (range 0 to 100). Regardless of objective urodynamic criteria (indicating obstruction or relief of obstruction), the number of men reporting subjective improvement and the degree of improvement were similar. Only 4 men (11%) reported new retrograde ejaculation. The proportion of men with improvement after transurethral incision of the prostate compares favorably to long-term data available on transurethral resection of the prostate. Assessing the degree of improvement (overall satisfaction) is unique and has not been previously reported. These results clearly demonstrate that in selected patients transurethral incision of the prostate is an effective procedure for long-term relief of outlet obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7692097     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35858-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  [S2e guideline of the German urologists: Instrumental treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Authors:  T Bschleipfer; T Bach; R Berges; K Dreikorn; C Gratzke; S Madersbacher; M-S Michel; R Muschter; M Oelke; O Reich; C Tschuschke; K Höfner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  R J Simpson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Diagnosis and treatment of primary bladder neck obstruction in men.

Authors:  Chad Huckabay; Victor W Nitti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Changing therapeutic regimens in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clinical and economic considerations.

Authors:  H J Stoevelaar; J McDonnell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Overactive bladder in the male patient: bladder, outlet, or both?

Authors:  Khaled F Abdel-Aziz; Gary E Lemack
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 6.  Sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  P K Hegarty; N J Hegarty; J M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.862

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.