Literature DB >> 7691866

Centrifugation of human spermatozoa induces sublethal damage; separation of human spermatozoa from seminal plasma by a dextran swim-up procedure without centrifugation extends their motile lifetime.

J G Alvarez1, J L Lasso, L Blasco, R C Nuñez, S Heyner, P P Caballero, B T Storey.   

Abstract

While washing of human sperm cells by centrifugation and resuspension is a procedure in widespread use, there have been indications that this procedure per se may be harmful to the cells. The objective of this study was to investigate this question. To this end, a method for the clean separation of motile human spermatozoa from seminal plasma in the absence of centrifugation was developed, using a modified swim-up procedure, in which liquefied semen was mixed with an equal volume of 30 mg/ml dextran in medium, and the mixture overlaid with medium containing 5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, forming two discreet layers with stable interface. The percentage of motile cells in a given sample was consistently > 80% immediately after recovery. Damage to the cells was assessed by loss of motile cells during incubation up to 96 h post-recovery. Comparison of aliquots of spermatozoa obtained by the dextran swim-up procedure showed that the aliquot subjected to centrifugation had 4 +/- 3% motile cells after 48 h, while the untreated aliquot had 52 +/- 12%. The aliquots showed no difference 1 h post-recovery. Similar results were obtained with spermatozoa that had been centrifuged in seminal plasma and resuspended in fresh plasma, then recovered by dextran swim-up. The delayed onset of motility loss in the centrifuged samples implies that this treatment induces sublethal damage in the cells. Comparison of the standard swim-up and Percoll gradient methods for sperm recovery, both of which involve centrifugation steps, showed decline in motility of the samples similar to that seen with dextran swim-up of centrifuged cells. We conclude that centrifugation per se induces sublethal damage in human spermatozoa, independently of treatment method, and suggest that recovery methods for human spermatozoa which avoid centrifugation might partially alleviate the damage incurred by these cells during cryopreservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7691866     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  16 in total

1.  Frequency of Sperm DNA Fragmentation According to Selection Method: Comparison and Relevance of a Microfluidic Device and a Swim-up Procedure.

Authors:  Kanako Kishi; Hiromi Ogata; Seiji Ogata; Yuri Mizusawa; Eri Okamoto; Yukiko Matsumoto; Shoji Kokeguchi; Masahide Shiotani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

2.  Cell handling using microstructured membranes.

Authors:  Daniel Irimia; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Centrifugal pulsing increases the recovery of viable spermatozoa.

Authors:  P Bielfeld; V Acosta; R S Jeyendran
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Development of a microchamber which spontaneously selects high-quality sperm for use in in vitro fertilization or micromanipulation.

Authors:  C H Lih; M Obasaju; C McCaffrey; J W Gordon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Rheotaxis-based separation of sperm with progressive motility using a microfluidic corral system.

Authors:  Meisam Zaferani; Soon Hon Cheong; Alireza Abbaspourrad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection outcomes: the role of sperm preparation techniques.

Authors:  Edson Borges; Amanda Souza Setti; Livia Vingris; Rita de Cassia Savio Figueira; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Assumpto Iaconelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Application of microfluidic technologies to human assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Gary D Smith; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 8.  Lab-on-a-chip biophotonics: its application to assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  David Lai; Gary D Smith; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.207

9.  Effects of various physical stress factors on mitochondrial function and reactive oxygen species in rat spermatozoa.

Authors:  Suhee Kim; Cansu Agca; Yuksel Agca
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 10.  An Update on Oxidative Damage to Spermatozoa and Oocytes.

Authors:  Chinyerum S Opuwari; Ralf R Henkel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.