| Literature DB >> 7691553 |
A P Rudell1, R Q Cracco, N F Hassan, L P Eberle.
Abstract
The recognition potential (RP) was distinguished from P3 and eye blink responses by its sensitivity to visual area stimulated. Images were flashed in upper and lower hemifields. Current source density profiles were computed, using 16 midline scalp electrodes. For P3 and eye blink profiles, the hemifield stimulated was not a significant factor. For the recognition potential, upper and lower field stimulation produced radically different profiles. An improved recognition potential signal was obtained by a new mathematical procedure. It used the difference in sensitivity to visual area stimulated to reject P3 and eye blink responses.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1993 PMID: 7691553 DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90022-n
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol ISSN: 0013-4694