Literature DB >> 7691541

Determinants of the auditory mismatch response.

T Imada1, R Hari, N Loveless, L McEvoy, M Sams.   

Abstract

The auditory mismatch field (MMF) is supposed to reflect a comparison process between an infrequent deviant stimulus and the memory trace left by frequent standard stimuli. Therefore, the MMF amplitude has been thought to depend on the strength of such a trace. We examined this hypothesis in records with a 24-channel planar SQUID magnetometer by varying the number of stimuli preceding each deviant, the interdeviant interval (IDI) and the interstimulus interval (ISI) just preceding the deviant (pISI). When a constant IDI was employed and the number of standards between two deviants varied in different sessions, MMF amplitude increased as the number of standards increased. However, MMF did not depend on the number of standards between two deviants when the number varied within a single session and ISI varied as well. MMF decreased slightly when pISI increased from 0.6 to 3.4 sec. When IDI increased and the ISI remained constant, MMF amplitude increased. Most results can be explained within the framework of the memory-trace hypothesis of MMF generation. However, the strengthening of the trace seems to be a complex process which is also affected by the temporal features of the stimulus sequence.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7691541     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90120-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  12 in total

1.  Cortical processing of change detection: dissociation between natural vowels and two-frequency complex tones.

Authors:  M Vihla; O V Lounasmaa; R Salmelin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mismatch negativity: the contribution of differences in the refractoriness of stimulus-specific neuron populations.

Authors:  M D Evstigneeva; A A Aleksandrov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10-15

3.  Mismatch negativity encoding of prediction errors predicts S-ketamine-induced cognitive impairments.

Authors:  André Schmidt; Rosilla Bachmann; Michael Kometer; Philipp A Csomor; Klaas E Stephan; Erich Seifritz; Franz X Vollenweider
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  A Perceptual Inference Mechanism for Hallucinations Linked to Striatal Dopamine.

Authors:  Clifford M Cassidy; Peter D Balsam; Jodi J Weinstein; Rachel J Rosengard; Mark Slifstein; Nathaniel D Daw; Anissa Abi-Dargham; Guillermo Horga
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Non-linear laws of echoic memory and auditory change detection in humans.

Authors:  Koji Inui; Tomokazu Urakawa; Koya Yamashiro; Naofumi Otsuru; Makoto Nishihara; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Sumru Keceli; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  Deficits in auditory predictive coding in individuals with the psychosis risk syndrome: Prediction of conversion to psychosis.

Authors:  Susanna L Fryer; Brian J Roach; Holly K Hamilton; Peter Bachman; Aysenil Belger; Ricardo E Carrión; Erica Duncan; Jason Johannesen; Gregory A Light; Margaret Niznikiewicz; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Larry Seidman; Ming Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-08

7.  Modelling trial-by-trial changes in the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Jean Daunizeau; Marta I Garrido; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Mismatch responses in the awake rat: evidence from epidural recordings of auditory cortical fields.

Authors:  Fabienne Jung; Klaas Enno Stephan; Heiko Backes; Rosalyn Moran; Markus Gramer; Tetsuya Kumagai; Rudolf Graf; Heike Endepols; Marc Tittgemeyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Auditory cortical and hippocampal-system mismatch responses to duration deviants in urethane-anesthetized rats.

Authors:  Timo Ruusuvirta; Arto Lipponen; Eeva Pellinen; Markku Penttonen; Piia Astikainen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression.

Authors:  Genevieve Z Steiner; Robert J Barry; Craig J Gonsalvez
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.