Literature DB >> 7690225

A multicenter trial for resuscitation of injured patients with 7.5% sodium chloride. The effect of added dextran 70. The Multicenter Group for the Study of Hypertonic Saline in Trauma Patients.

M J Vassar1, R P Fischer, P E O'Brien, B L Bachulis, J A Chambers, D B Hoyt, J W Holcroft.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of 250 mL of a 7.5% sodium chloride solution, both with and without added dextran 70, for the prehospital resuscitation of hypotensive trauma patients.
DESIGN: Double-blind randomized trial.
SETTING: Six trauma systems served by helicopter transport. PATIENTS: Injured patients with systolic blood pressures less than 90 mm Hg at any time in the field or during helicopter transport.
INTERVENTIONS: Infusion of study solution, in the field or during transport, followed by conventional isotonic solutions as needed. Solutions studied in four cohorts were as follows: (1) lactated Ringer's; (2) 7.5% sodium chloride (hypertonic saline); (3) 7.5% sodium chloride combined with 6% dextran 70; and (4) 7.5% sodium chloride combined with 12% dextran 70. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure response; survival to time of hospital discharge among the treatment groups; and survival compared with that predicted by norms from the Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS).
RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) change in systolic blood pressure on arrival in the emergency department was significantly higher in the hypertonic saline solution group than that in the lactated Ringer's solution group (34 +/- 46 vs 11 +/- 49 mm Hg, P < .03). Overall survival in the four treatment groups was 49%, 60%, 56%, and 45% (not statistically significant). Survival in the hypertonic saline solution group, however, was significantly higher than that predicted by the MTOS norms (60% vs 48%, P < .001). Survival to hospital discharge in patients with baseline Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 8 or less was correlated with treatment group (P < .05 by logistic regression and P < .01 by Cox proportional-hazards analysis; with survival in the hypertonic saline solution group [34%] vs lactated Ringer's solution group [12%]).
CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital infusion of 250 mL of 7.5% sodium chloride is associated with an increase in blood pressure and an increase in survival to hospital discharge compared with survival predicted by the MTOS norms. Patients with low baseline Glasgow Coma Scale scores seem to benefit the most from 7.5% sodium chloride resuscitation. Hypertonic saline solution without added dextran 70 is as effective as the more expensive solutions that contain dextran 70.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7690225     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420210067009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  31 in total

Review 1.  [Small-volume resuscitation for hypovolemic shock. Concept, experimental and clinical results].

Authors:  U Kreimeier; F Christ; L Frey; O Habler; M Thiel; M Welte; B Zwissler; K Peter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Selective inhibition of polymorphonuclear neutrophils by resuscitative concentration of hypertonic saline.

Authors:  S H Choi; S W Lee; Y S Hong; J M Jeun; B W Min
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Hypertonic saline dextran after burn injury decreases inflammatory cytokine responses to subsequent pneumonia-related sepsis.

Authors:  Jureta W Horton; David L Maass; D Jean White
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  Searching for the evidence in pre-hospital care: a review of randomised controlled trials. On behalf of the Ambulance Response Time Sub-Group of the National Ambulance Advisory Committee.

Authors:  H Brazier; A W Murphy; C Lynch; G Bury
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-01

5.  Hypertonic saline resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock diminishes neutrophil rolling and adherence to endothelium and reduces in vivo vascular leakage.

Authors:  José L Pascual; Lorenzo E Ferri; Andrew J E Seely; Giuseppina Campisi; Prosanto Chaudhury; Betty Giannias; David C Evans; Tarek Razek; René P Michel; Nicolas V Christou
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  7.5% saline and 7.5% saline/6% dextran for hypovolemic shock.

Authors:  Eileen M Bulger
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-05

7.  Collider bias in trauma comparative effectiveness research: the stratification blues for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Deborah J Del Junco; Eileen M Bulger; Erin E Fox; John B Holcomb; Karen J Brasel; David B Hoyt; James J Grady; Sarah Duran; Patricia Klotz; Michael A Dubick; Charles E Wade
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 8.  Salt of the earth or a drop in the ocean? A pathophysiological approach to fluid resuscitation.

Authors:  P Gosling
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Blood loss and transcapillary refill in uncontrolled treated hemorrhage in dogs.

Authors:  Elias Aissar Sallum; Sueli Sinozaki; Ana Maria Calil; Raul Coimbra; Maurício Rocha E Silva; Luis Francisco Poli de Figueiredo; Dario Birolini
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 10.  Hypertonic versus near isotonic crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  F Bunn; I Roberts; R Tasker; E Akpa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.