Literature DB >> 7690046

An intelligent and cost-effective computer dosing system for individualizing FK506 therapy in transplantation and autoimmune disorders.

J McMichael1, R Lieberman, H Doyle, J McCauley, J Fung, T E Starzl.   

Abstract

The accuracy and precision of an intelligent dosing system (IDS) for FK506 in predicting doses to achieve target drug levels has been prospectively evaluated in transplant and autoimmune patients. For dose individualization, the knowledge base is updated with patient-specific feedback including the current dose, drug level, and the new target level. The study population of 147 patients consisted of 97 transplant patients (liver and kidney) and 50 patients with autoimmune disorders. Patients in the transplant study group were entered sequentially and followed as a cohort. Patients in the autoimmune study group were randomly assigned to one of three predefined FK506 concentration windows (low, 0.1-.3; medium, 0.4-.7; and high, 0.8-1.3 ng/mL) as part of a concentration controlled clinical trial. Predictions of steady-state plasma drug levels were made throughout the clinical course of autoimmune patients and during the first 6 weeks post-transplant in liver and kidney recipients. FK506 concentration in plasma was measured by a monoclonal antibody based ELISA assay. Accuracy was computed as the mean prediction error (mpe). Precision was computed as the root mean squared prediction error (rmspe). The accuracy of the IDS in each study group was as follows: 0.016 ng/mL (liver), -0.034 ng/mL (kidney), and -0.022 ng/mL (autoimmune). Because the 95% confidence interval included zero in each case, the IDS showed no bias. The precision of the IDS in each study group was as follows: 0.133 ng mL (liver), 0.1903 ng/mL (kidney), and 0.1188 ng/mL (autoimmune). These results indicate that the FK506 IDS is both accurate and very precise (reproducible) in transplant and autoimmune patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7690046      PMCID: PMC3016879          DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1993.tb04711.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  17 in total

1.  A cost comparison of liver transplantation with FK 506 or CyA as the primary immunosuppressive agent.

Authors:  S Staschak; S Wagner; G Block; D H Van Thiel; A Jain; J Fung; S Todo; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Strategy of FK 506 therapy in liver transplant patients: effect of graft function.

Authors:  K M Abu-Elmagd; J J Fung; M Alessiani; A Jain; S Takaya; R Venkataramanan; V S Warty; W Shannon; S Todo; A Tzakis
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  A randomized trial of primary liver transplantation under immunosuppression with FK 506 vs cyclosporine.

Authors:  J Fung; K Abu-Elmagd; A Jain; R Gordon; A Tzakis; S Todo; S Takaya; M Alessiani; A Demetris; O Bronster
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Drug therapy. Serum drug concentrations as therapeutic guides.

Authors:  J Koch-Weser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1972-08-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Feedback control methods for drug dosage optimisation. Concepts, classification and clinical application.

Authors:  S Vozeh; J L Steimer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Open-loop-feedback control of serum drug concentrations: pharmacokinetic approaches to drug therapy.

Authors:  R W Jelliffe
Journal:  Med Instrum       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug

7.  Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-08

8.  FK 506 for liver, kidney, and pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl; S Todo; J Fung; A J Demetris; R Venkataramman; A Jain
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-10-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Optimization of cyclosporine therapy in renal transplantation by a pharmacokinetic strategy.

Authors:  B D Kahan; J Grevel
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Dose-dependent kinetics for theophylline: observations among ambulatory asthmatic children.

Authors:  E Sarrazin; L Hendeles; M Weinberger; K Muir; S Riegelman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part II.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; Meagan J Bemer; Janel Long-Boyle
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus.

Authors:  R Venkataramanan; A Swaminathan; T Prasad; A Jain; S Zuckerman; V Warty; J McMichael; J Lever; G Burckart; T Starzl
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Drug administration in patients with renal insufficiency. Minimising renal and extrarenal toxicity.

Authors:  G R Matzke; R F Frye
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Influence of FK 506 (tacrolimus) on circulating CD4+ T cells expressing CD25 and CD45RA antigens in 19 patients with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis participating in an open label drug safety trial.

Authors:  B Lemster; L L Huang; W Irish; J Woo; P B Carroll; K Abu-Elmagd; H R Rilo; N Johnson; R Russell-Hall; J J Fung
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.815

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.