Literature DB >> 7685827

Protein structures from distance inequalities.

J Bohr1, H Bohr, S Brunak, R M Cotterill, H Fredholm, B Lautrup, S B Petersen.   

Abstract

A computer method for folding protein backbones from distance inequalities is presented. It involves an algorithm that uses a novel approach for handling inequalities through the minimization of a continuous energy function. Tests of the folding algorithm have been carried out on a small protein, the 6PTI (bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor) with 56 amino acid residues, and on a medium-size protein, the 1TRM (rat trypsin) with 223 amino acid residues. Reconstructions based on a real-valued distance matrix led to folded three-dimensional structures with root-mean-square values of 0.04 A when compared with the crystallographic data. The obtained root-mean-square measures were of the order of 1 A, when distance inequalities were used for the reconstruction. Subsequently, the folding approach has been applied to distance inequalities predicted by neural network techniques that use the amino acid sequence as the only input. The inaccuracy in the inequalities predicted by the neural network was the reason for the root-mean-square value of 5.2 A. An error analysis of the method for reconstruction was performed and showed that no more than 3% inaccurate distance inequalities could be corrected for. Finally, a simple technique for root-mean-square comparisons of different protein structures is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7685827     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  12 in total

1.  Relationship between protein structure and geometrical constraints.

Authors:  O Lund; J Hansen; S Brunak; J Bohr
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  CONFOLD: Residue-residue contact-guided ab initio protein folding.

Authors:  Badri Adhikari; Debswapna Bhattacharya; Renzhi Cao; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-06-06

3.  A critical assessment of information-guided protein-protein docking predictions.

Authors:  Edward S C Shih; Ming-Jing Hwang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Evaluation of residue-residue contact predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Krzysztof Fidelis; Anna Tramontano; Andriy Kryshtafovych
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-09-17

5.  The DEF data base of sequence based protein fold class predictions.

Authors:  M Reczko; H Bohr
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Evaluation of residue-residue contact prediction in CASP10.

Authors:  Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Daniel D'Andrea; Krzysztof Fidelis; Anna Tramontano; Andriy Kryshtafovych
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-31

7.  Forecasting residue-residue contact prediction accuracy.

Authors:  P P Wozniak; B M Konopka; J Xu; G Vriend; M Kotulska
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Blurring contact maps of thousands of proteins: what we can learn by reconstructing 3D structure.

Authors:  Marco Vassura; Pietro Di Lena; Luciano Margara; Maria Mirto; Giovanni Aloisio; Piero Fariselli; Rita Casadio
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.522

9.  On the importance of the distance measures used to train and test knowledge-based potentials for proteins.

Authors:  Martin Carlsen; Patrice Koehl; Peter Røgen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Four distances between pairs of amino acids provide a precise description of their interaction.

Authors:  Mati Cohen; Vladimir Potapov; Gideon Schreiber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.