Literature DB >> 7683675

Error-prone polymerization by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Contribution of template-primer misalignment, miscoding, and termination probability to mutational hot spots.

K Bebenek1, J Abbotts, S H Wilson, T A Kunkel.   

Abstract

We have observed previously that DNA template-directed polymerization by the type 1 human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase is error-prone for single-nucleotide substitution, addition and deletion errors at homopolymeric sequences. We have also noted strong termination of processive synthesis at these positions (Bebenek, K., Abbotts, J., Roberts, J. D., Wilson, S. H., and Kunkel, T. A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 16948-16956). Here we have tested three models to explain errors at these hot spots: template-primer misalignment for deletion errors, and dislocation and direct miscoding for substitution errors. The approach involves introducing single-nucleotide changes within or flanking the homopolymeric hot spots and examining the effects that these changes have on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase error rate, error specificity, and termination probability. The results obtained suggest that single-nucleotide deletion errors in homopolymeric runs result from template-primer misalignment and that both direct miscoding and template-primer dislocation contribute to the base substitution hot spots. The data also suggest that base substitution errors at one position can be templated by the preceding nucleotide or either of the next two nucleotides. Frameshift error rates at homopolymeric sites were affected by changes in the sequences flanking the runs, including single-nucleotide differences in the single-stranded template strand and in the double-stranded primer region as many as six nucleotides distant from the hot spot. Both increases and decreases in frameshift fidelity were observed, and most of these correlated with concomitant increases or decreases in the probability that HIV-1 reverse transcriptase terminated processive synthesis within the run. These data provide further support for a relationship between the frameshift fidelity and the processivity of DNA-dependent DNA synthesis by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7683675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  63 in total

Review 1.  A biochemical mechanism for nonrandom mutations and evolution.

Authors:  B E Wright
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Replication slippage involves DNA polymerase pausing and dissociation.

Authors:  E Viguera; D Canceill; S D Ehrlich
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Synthetic biology. Genomically encoded analog memory with precise in vivo DNA writing in living cell populations.

Authors:  Fahim Farzadfard; Timothy K Lu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Augmentation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype E (CRF01_AE) multiple-drug resistance by insertion of a foreign 11-amino-acid fragment into the reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  H Sato; Y Tomita; K Ebisawa; A Hachiya; K Shibamura; T Shiino; R Yang; M Tatsumi; K Gushi; H Umeyama; S Oka; Y Takebe; Y Nagai
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Potent antiviral HIV-1 protease inhibitor GRL-02031 adapts to the structures of drug resistant mutants with its P1'-pyrrolidinone ring.

Authors:  Yu-Chung E Chang; XiaXia Yu; Ying Zhang; Yunfeng Tie; Yuan-Fang Wang; Sofiya Yashchuk; Arun K Ghosh; Robert W Harrison; Irene T Weber
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Nature, position, and frequency of mutations made in a single cycle of HIV-1 replication.

Authors:  Michael E Abram; Andrea L Ferris; Wei Shao; W Gregory Alvord; Stephen H Hughes
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Development of an in vivo assay to identify structural determinants in murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase important for fidelity.

Authors:  E K Halvas; E S Svarovskaia; V K Pathak
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 8.  Insertions in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease and reverse transcriptase genes: clinical impact and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark A Winters; Thomas C Merigan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Template usage is responsible for the preferential acquisition of the K65R reverse transcriptase mutation in subtype C variants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Authors:  Dimitrios Coutsinos; Cédric F Invernizzi; Hongtao Xu; Daniela Moisi; Maureen Oliveira; Bluma G Brenner; Mark A Wainberg
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Lower in vivo mutation rate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 than that predicted from the fidelity of purified reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  L M Mansky; H M Temin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.