Literature DB >> 7682886

Economic burden of treated benign prostatic hyperplasia in the United Kingdom.

M F Drummond1, A J McGuire, N A Black, M Petticrew, C K McPherson.   

Abstract

Recent epidemiological studies suggest that much urological disease is untreated. However, the overall economic burden of urological diseases has never been systematically studied. This report estimates the economic burden of treated benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in the United Kingdom by considering the direct costs falling on the health service, the indirect costs in lost production, and the intangible costs in reduced quality of life. Depending on the assumptions made, the economic burden in 1990 is estimated to have been between 62 million pounds and 91 million pounds annually, excluding the intangible costs. The maximum cost to the National Health Service (NHS) represents approximately 0.4% of total NHS expenditure. This finding is therefore consistent with the results of recent epidemiological studies, which suggest that the main burden of BPH is borne by sufferers in terms of reduction in quality of life and is not reflected in consumption of health care resources. However, this balance may change as a result of the new General Practitioner contract and new treatment options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7682886     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb15945.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  9 in total

1.  Cost-of-illness studies: a major headache?

Authors:  M Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia: cost and effectiveness of three alternative surgical treatment methods used in a Turkish hospital.

Authors:  Ismail Agirbas; Mehtap Tatar; Adnan Kisa
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  A pharmacoeconomic analysis of patients with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  P C Cockrum; S F Finder; A J Ries; R P Potyk
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The economics of benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms in the United States.

Authors:  David A Taub; John T Wei
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  The economic burden of coronary heart disease in the UK.

Authors:  J L Y Liu; N Maniadakis; A Gray; M Rayner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Finasteride: an update of its use in the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  M I Wilde; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Economics of different treatment options of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Turkey.

Authors:  Y Ilker; T Tarcan; A Akdaş
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Current pharmacological treatment.

Authors:  M Jønler; M Riehmann; R C Bruskewitz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Dutasteride plus tamsulosin fixed-dose combination first-line therapy versus tamsulosin monotherapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a budget impact analysis in the Greek healthcare setting.

Authors:  Maria Geitona; Pinelopi Karabela; Ioannis A Katsoulis; Hara Kousoulakou; Eleni Lyberopoulou; Eleftherios Bitros; Loukas Xaplanteris; Sotiria Papanicolaou
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.264

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.