Literature DB >> 7681080

Differential binding of a minor histocompatibility antigen peptide to H-2 class I molecules correlates with immune responsiveness.

P J Wettstein1, G M van Bleek, S G Nathenson.   

Abstract

Minor histocompatibility (H) Ag are recognized in the context of MHC class I (K/D) molecules and can constitute a strong barrier to tissue transplantation. The products encoded by the MHC (H-2 in mice) have been shown recently to be Ag-presenting molecules that bind foreign and self peptides in their peptide binding sites. Different class I molecules preferentially bind different arrays of endogenous peptides for presentation to CTL. Previous studies showed that the Kb-restricted CTL response to one minor histocompatibility Ag, H-4, varied in different Kb mutants. One possible basis for this variation might be that the response is regulated by the level of binding of an H-4 peptide by class I molecules. To analyze this possibility, we initiated studies to identify the H-4 peptide that is included in the array of self peptides. The complete mixture of peptides eluted from Kb molecules of H-4+ tumor cells was able to sensitize H-4- targets for lysis by H-4-specific CTL. The presence of a specific H-4 peptide was confirmed when the radiolabeled peptide mix eluted from Kb molecules was separated by HPLC. Only one peak in the profile of H-4+ tumor peptides was capable of sensitizing H-4- targets for lysis by H-4-specific CTL; this active peak was absent in H-4 mutant cells. Peptide mixtures eluted from a panel of Kb mutant molecules extracted from H-4+ lymphocytes varied in their capacities to sensitize targets for H-4-specific lysis and the relative sensitization correlated with the demonstrated capacity of mutant mice to generate H-4-specific CTL. Therefore, the highly specific genetic control of the T cell response to the H-4 minor histocompatibility Ag appears to be due to the differential binding of an H-4 peptide by class I molecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7681080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  6 in total

1.  Hierarchy of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses in individuals carrying different subtypes of an HLA allele: implications for epitope-based antiviral vaccines.

Authors:  R Khanna; S R Burrows; A Neisig; J Neefjes; D J Moss; S L Silins
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Peptide binding to MHC class I molecules: implications for antigenic peptide prediction.

Authors:  K C Parker; M Shields; M DiBrino; A Brooks; J E Coligan
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.829

3.  H4 and CTT-2 minor histocompatibility antigens: concordant genetic linkage and migration in two-dimensional peptide separation.

Authors:  W K Nevala; P J Wettstein
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  Determinant selection of major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted antigenic peptides is explained by class I-peptide affinity and is strongly influenced by nondominant anchor residues.

Authors:  W Chen; S Khilko; J Fecondo; D H Margulies; J McCluskey
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  Conformational differences in major histocompatibility complex-peptide complexes can result in alloreactivity.

Authors:  S Chattopadhyay; M Theobald; J Biggs; L A Sherman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  The life span of major histocompatibility complex-peptide complexes influences the efficiency of presentation and immunogenicity of two class I-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes in the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 4.

Authors:  V Levitsky; Q J Zhang; J Levitskaya; M G Masucci
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.