Literature DB >> 7679047

Stage D1 prostate cancer. A nonrandomized comparison of conservative treatment options versus radical prostatectomy.

C W Cheng1, E J Bergstralh, H Zincke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Untreated Stage D1 prostate cancer is associated with a high progression rate. Various treatment modalities involving monotherapy alone have been associated with dismal results. In this retrospective study, the impact of combination therapy, local (surgery or radiation) and systemic (hormonal), compared with that of monotherapy on disease outcome was evaluated.
METHODS: The authors reviewed 631 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy for Stage D1 prostate cancer: 251 had radical prostatectomies and orchiectomies, 78 had radical prostatectomies alone, 97 received local irradiation and underwent orchiectomies, and 60 had orchiectomies alone.
RESULTS: Cause-specific survival rates for prostatectomy-orchiectomy-treated (PO) patients at 5 and 10 years were 91% and 78%, respectively; they were 84% and 54% for irradiation-orchiectomy-treated (IO) patients and 66% and 39% for orchiectomy alone-treated (O) patients, respectively. Controlling for the number of nodes, the difference between PO-treated and IO-treated patients was not significant; the former group had a significantly longer survival than the O-treated patients (P = 0.037). The 5-year and 10-year cause-specific survival rates for prostatectomy alone-treated patients were 91% and 75%, respectively, and 84% and 45% for irradiation alone-treated patients. Thus, cause-specific survival rates in prostatectomy alone-treated patients were significantly better (P = 0.0085).
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with Stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma, radical prostatectomy and local irradiation as local treatments when combined with orchiectomy produce similar outcomes. These results should be verified in a prospective study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7679047     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<996::aid-cncr2820711417>3.0.co;2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

Review 1.  ACP Broadsheet No 146: August 1995. Macroscopic examination of prostatic specimens.

Authors:  P Harnden; M C Parkinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Accuracy and cost of intraoperative lymph node frozen sections at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  M P Young; R S Kirby; E P O'Donoghue; M C Parkinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  [Locally advanced prostate carcinoma (T2b-T4 N0) without and with clinical evidence of local progression (Tx N+) with lymphatic metastasis. Is radiotherapy for pelvic lymphatic metastasis indicated or not?].

Authors:  T Wiegel; W Hinkelbein
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  [Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: indications, results and side effects].

Authors:  T Wiegel; U Steiner; W Hinkelbein
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Early versus deferred androgen suppression therapy for patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Bastian Keck; Gerta Rücker; Edith Motschall; Bernd Wullich; Gerd Antes; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Treatment of Oligometastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Kyo Chul Koo; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.759

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.