Literature DB >> 7678755

Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) sponges as implant materials: in vivo and in vitro evaluation of cellular invasion.

T V Chirila1, I J Constable, G J Crawford, S Vijayasekaran, D E Thompson, Y C Chen, W A Fletcher, B J Griffin.   

Abstract

The pore size and the in vivo behaviour of four poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) sponges were investigated. The sponges were synthesized by polymerization of monomer in 70, 80 and 90 wt% water, respectively. In one of the formulations, a high amount of initiator was added. The average pore diameter was calculated with Ferry's equation and the results compared to those obtained by examination of samples using environmental scanning electron microscopy. The use of the equation greatly underestimated the size of pores. We also showed that the pores in polymers obtained in 70 wt% water were not interconnected, whilst the pores in polymers obtained in 80 and 90 wt% water, respectively, were larger and interconnected throughout the polymer. When implanted subcutaneously in rabbits, only the latter polymers allowed invasion and proliferation of cells. Penetration and proliferation of cells in these sponges were also assessed by an in vitro method using cultured human fibroblasts. The procedure included the overlaying of a glass plate covered by confluent cultured cells on to the surface of polymer impregnated with collagen. The depth of migration and number of sections needed to be cut to count a fixed number of invading cells were measured after incubation for 2 wk and used as indicators in comparing the ability of various sponges to allow cellular invasion. The assay showed that more cells invaded a hydrogel sponge produced in 80 wt% water than one produced in 90 wt% water. It also showed that the cut polymer surfaces allowed a greater cellular invasion than the moulded ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7678755     DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90072-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  27 in total

1.  Adsorption of a blood protein on to hydrophilic sponges based on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate).

Authors:  A K Bajpai; D D Mishra
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  PolyHEMA and polyHEMA-poly(MMA-co-AA) as substrates for culturing Vero cells.

Authors:  C B Lombello; S M Malmonge; M L Wada
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Hydrophilic sponges based on 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate: part VII: modulation of sponge characteristics by changes in reactivity and hydrophilicity of crosslinking agents.

Authors:  X Lou; P D Dalton; T V Chirila
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Advances in the design of macroporous polymer scaffolds for potential applications in dentistry.

Authors:  Sidi A Bencherif; Thomas M Braschler; Philippe Renaud
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Production of neocollagen by cells invading hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea.

Authors:  T V Chirila; D E Thompson-Wallis; G J Crawford; I J Constable; S Vijayasekaran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The soft keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  D R Caldwell
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1997

7.  Hydrogel macroporosity and the prolongation of transgene expression and the enhancement of angiogenesis.

Authors:  Jaclyn A Shepard; Farrukh R Virani; Ashley G Goodman; Timothy D Gossett; Seungjin Shin; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Hydroxyapatite promotes superior keratocyte adhesion and proliferation in comparison with current keratoprosthesis skirt materials.

Authors:  J S Mehta; C E Futter; S R Sandeman; R G A F Faragher; K A Hing; K E Tanner; B D S Allan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Cellular bioenergetics is an important determinant of the molecular imaging signal derived from luciferase and the sodium-iodide symporter.

Authors:  Connie Chang; Angel Chan; Xiaoping Lin; Takahiro Higuchi; John Terrovitis; Junaid M Afzal; Andrew Rittenbach; Dongdong Sun; Styliani Vakrou; Kirubel Woldemichael; Brian O'Rourke; Richard Wahl; Martin Pomper; Benjamin Tsui; M Roselle Abraham
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Calcification capacity of porous pHEMA-TiO₂ composite hydrogels.

Authors:  Chao Li; Yu-Feng Zheng; Xia Lou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.