Literature DB >> 7678047

Sham versus transurethral microwave thermotherapy in patients with symptoms of benign prostatic bladder outflow obstruction.

C W Ogden1, P Reddy, H Johnson, J W Ramsay, S S Carter.   

Abstract

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) is a single-session, minimally invasive outpatient treatment for patients with symptoms of benign prostatic bladder outflow obstruction. We designed a prospective randomised trial to identify any placebo response. Patients with a Madsen symptom score over 8 for at least 6 months were eligible for study. Two measurements of urinary flow less than 15 mL/s and a residual urine of under 350 mL were also required for entry. Patients with renal dysfunction, upper urinary tract disease, co-existing bladder disease, and malignant prostatic change were excluded. 43 patients were studied: 21 were randomised to receive a sham treatment and 22 to thermotherapy. Sham treatments were done with the urethral applicator in situ. 40 patients were available for evaluation at 3 months. 2 patients had delayed follow-up and 1 patient randomised to TUMT has undergone transurethral resection. The thermotherapy group showed a 70% decrease (from 14.5 to 4.3) in the mean Madsen score, a 53% increase in flow-rate (8.5 to 13.0 mL/s), and 92% decrease in residual urine volume (147 to 12 mL). No significant change was seen in these mean indices in the sham group. There was no difference in the main complication of transient haematuria between the two groups. However, there was a 22% frequency of acute retention in the TUMT group. The results show little significant placebo component to the subjective and objective improvement that occurs in patients who have received TUMT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7678047     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92482-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  9 in total

1.  Minimally invasive procedures and medical management-their relative merits in treating lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  B Djavan; M Marberger
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: past, present and future.

Authors:  J J de la Rosette; A Tubaro; K Höfner; S S Carter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Transurethral laser ablation of the prostate--long-term results.

Authors:  A J Costello; D G Lusaya; H R Crowe
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Practical treatment guidelines.

Authors:  T Tammela
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Why is transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) positively effective?

Authors:  T Sugiyama; Y C Park; T Hanai; N Ohnishi; T Kurita
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Evaluation and results of treatments for prostatism.

Authors:  D E Neal
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1994

Review 7.  Minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan Va Franco; Jae Hung Jung; Mari Imamura; Michael Borofsky; Muhammad Imran Omar; Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay; Shamar Young; Jafar Golzarian; Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Luis Garegnani; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-15

8.  An analysis of the costs of alternative treatments for benign prostatic hypertrophy.

Authors:  J A Vale; A S Bdesha; R O Witherow
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Juan Va Franco; Luis Garegnani; Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay; Michael Borofsky; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.