Literature DB >> 7678041

Differential immunoreactivity of epidermal growth factor receptor in benign, dysplastic and malignant prostatic tissues.

G K Ibrahim1, B J Kerns, J A MacDonald, S N Ibrahim, R B Kinney, P A Humphrey, C N Robertson.   

Abstract

To investigate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) presence in the prostate, monoclonal antibody (clone EGFR1) immunohistochemical examination of radical prostatectomy specimens was performed (n = 37). All prostatic specimens contained benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and/or dysplasia (prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or PIN), as well as prostatic carcinoma (CaP). Areas of dysplasia were further categorized as to the basal cell layer and the luminal cell area. BPH, PIN, and CaP tissues in each specimen were analyzed by a single observer and graded on a scale from 0-4+. Fifteen samples were also analyzed for EGFr content utilizing a Cell Analysis Systems (CAS 200) image cytometer. EGFr immunoreactivity of BPH basal cells was significantly higher than EGFr immunoreactivity in areas of CaP (p < 0.001). EGFr staining of BPH basal cells was also significantly higher than that seen in PIN luminal cells (p < 0.001). Immunoreactivity of EGFr in PIN basal cells was significantly higher than in PIN luminal cells (p < 0.001). EGFr staining of basal cells in BPH tissues was higher than that seen in the PIN basal cell layer but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). The amount of staining present in PIN luminal cells was also significantly greater than in CaP tissues (p = 0.002). Quantitative image analysis utilizing the CAS 200 image cytometer was performed on BPH and CaP areas exclusively. EGFr immunoreactivity in basal cells of the BPH tissues was significantly greater than that seen in CaP tissues (p < 0.001). The decreased EGFr immunoreactivity in CaP may reflect a differentiating role for EGFr in normal tissues. Loss of EGFr influence may be associated with an increased proliferative state in PIN and CaP. Destruction or alteration of the epidermal grwoth factor receptor by a protease, such as prostatic specific antigen, may also explain our findings. At the present time the meaning of the different amounts of EGFr in the various types of prostate tissues is unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7678041     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36032-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  Differential expression of cytokeratin mRNA and protein in normal prostate, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Yang; J Hao; X Liu; B Dalkin; R B Nagle
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  EGF promotes the shedding of soluble E-cadherin in an ADAM10-dependent manner in prostate epithelial cells.

Authors:  Magdalena M Grabowska; Brindar Sandhu; Mark L Day
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.315

Review 3.  Prostate cancer progression. Implications of histopathology.

Authors:  J L Ware
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and the epidermal growth factor receptor in normal and malignant prostate.

Authors:  E R Sherwood; C Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent stimulation of amphiregulin expression in androgen-stimulated human prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  I Sehgal; J Bailey; K Hitzemann; M R Pittelkow; N J Maihle
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Status of epidermal growth factor receptors family in hormone-dependent carcinomas of the breast and prostate with reference to serum lipids and lipoproteins.

Authors:  D Jain; A Ray; A K Bahadur; K U Chaturvedi; R Sood; S Sharma; S L Naik; B K Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2001-01

Review 7.  Growth factors and their receptors as determinants in the proliferation and metastasis of human prostate cancer.

Authors:  J L Ware
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  Activation of EGFR and ERBB2 by Helicobacter pylori results in survival of gastric epithelial cells with DNA damage.

Authors:  Rupesh Chaturvedi; Mohammad Asim; M Blanca Piazuelo; Fang Yan; Daniel P Barry; Johanna Carolina Sierra; Alberto G Delgado; Salisha Hill; Robert A Casero; Luis E Bravo; Ricardo L Dominguez; Pelayo Correa; D Brent Polk; M Kay Washington; Kristie L Rose; Kevin L Schey; Douglas R Morgan; Richard M Peek; Keith T Wilson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Epidermal growth factor receptor activation in androgen-independent but not androgen-stimulated growth of human prostatic carcinoma cells.

Authors:  E R Sherwood; J L Van Dongen; C G Wood; S Liao; J M Kozlowski; C Lee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  TEAD1 and c-Cbl are novel prostate basal cell markers that correlate with poor clinical outcome in prostate cancer.

Authors:  J F Knight; C J Shepherd; S Rizzo; D Brewer; S Jhavar; A R Dodson; C S Cooper; R Eeles; A Falconer; G Kovacs; M D Garrett; A R Norman; J Shipley; D L Hudson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.